Hi Bernard,
Welcome to the GB Mailing List.
I believe the simple answer is yes.
There is a wiki page which you may have already found which lists which
councils have released data which we can use. Norfolk is on that list.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_local_councils
That links to a
On 24 January 2014 07:29, Bernard Moore bcmo...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Norfolk County Council offer Public Rights of Way data on this page :-
http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/inspire/ (last row of the NCC block).
It is issued under Open Government Licence :-
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ …
Hi Robert,
Thanks for that extra info about licensing. I knew OS were at the route
of most licensing issues to do with maps of the UK but not in what way,
so that clears that up for me.
However, my view would be that if a County Council has issued data
under a license that we recognise as
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open Government
License is not widely accepted in the community.
Overall in the past 3 and a half years we have traced, imported or
otherwise derived large quantities of data under this license. Mike
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:32:50 +
SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open
Government License is not widely accepted in the community.
Overall in the past 3 and a half years we have traced, imported or
On 24 January 2014 11:32, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open Government
License is not widely accepted in the community.
In the light of OS's own interpretation that the OS-ODL is
incompatible with the
I don't think your last point is true: Mike was working to ensure data
created under cc-by-sa could be similarly moved over to ODbL (a different
matter). The relevant point is in this email
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2011-July/011998.htmlto
the list:
* Following my
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:25:14 +
SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
I for one prefer to rely on the formal and informal approaches taken
on behalf of OSMF by the LWG. I also defer to the experience of Mike
who has a long experience of running managing organisations
generating and exploiting a
On 24 January 2014 14:25, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
By all means say OSMf/LWG consider that OSGB OGL data can be included in
OSM, but
I personally avoid doing so ...
But as far I I know, that would be incorrect. According to Michael
Collinson's post at
You need to formally ask: Any other dataset published under the OS
OpenData License by other organisations, such as English Heritage, (or
by OS if any).
is unclear: ask who?
Ask the organisation doing the publishing (eg Norfolk CC), or OS?
My impression of the Mike Collinson dialogue was that
FWIW I have certainly had confirmation, more than once, that the someone else
i.e Hampshire County Council agree and they appear to have got confirmation
from the OS too.
This is an OpenData licence set.
I think some unambiguous consensus on this needs to be made clear by the OSMF
or whoever
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 24/01/2014 17:53, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I think some unambiguous consensus on this needs to be made clear by
the OSMF or whoever - as everyone seems to say different things which
leaves many confused. I will still admit to having no idea as to
whether I can use
12 matches
Mail list logo
