This seems to be new to me: how long should a route diversion be for before
being considered for inclusion on OpenStreetMap? A clarification may solve odd
questions about temporary closures, and be part of the standards scheme on the
wiki.
Thanks.
On 20/08/14 20:45, Antje Maroussi wrote:
Whereas I use London Buses route 24 Northbound” to help editors each
variant so they can put it to the right bus stop, max93600 has been
changing them carelessly with the comment Modifications diverses”:
in this editor’s recent edits, so that both
On 23/08/14 14:12, David Woolley wrote:
I think that giving both to and from destinations is going to be wrong,
unless there is are route variants that have different combinations.
However, except that the wiki example uses a clearly directed =, this
is basically the format used in the
Maybe I could try “London Buses 38 → Victoria”?
I just wanted to reduce the time it takes to find and update relation in JOSM,
given that the much-needed modernisation is a big thing.
Amaroussi (still trying to figure out why Mail insists in replying directly to
sender!)
On 23 Aug 2014, at
On 23/08/14 14:50, Amaroussi-OSM wrote:
Maybe I could try “London Buses 38 → Victoria”?
I don't think you need the network. The number should be locally unique
without that. People don't qualify bus numbers by London bus in real
life.
I just wanted to reduce the time it takes to find
Sorry for doing experiments on the mailing list, but what about:
38 Bus
38 Bus → Victoria
If this goes well I will put it in the wiki and reference the mailing list.
After that we need to talk about the future of coach routes.
On 23 Aug 2014, at 14:57, David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk
6 matches
Mail list logo
