So all shopkeepers are liable if they sell a hedge trimmer to someone who then
cuts off their fingers? I would be very surprised if that was the case
On 28 Jan 2015, at 13:52, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 28 January 2015 at 12:10, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Precisely !
On 28 January 2015 at 14:30, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 28/01/2015 14:24, Pmailkeey . wrote:
A 10 year old who buys cigarettes might conceivably accidentally smoke
them.
Err.. But it's illegal to sell to under age people.
---
This email has been checked for
On 28 January 2015 at 12:10, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
Do we need an OSM disclaimer
The copyright page does include:
Inclusion of data in OpenStreetMap does not imply that the original data
provider endorses OpenStreetMap, provides any
On 28/01/2015 14:24, Pmailkeey . wrote:
A 10 year old who buys cigarettes might conceivably accidentally smoke
them.
Err.. But it's illegal to sell to under age people.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
A 10 year old who buys cigarettes might conceivably accidentally smoke them.
On 28 January 2015 at 14:21, Phillip Barnett phillip.p.barn...@gmail.com
wrote:
So all shopkeepers are liable if they sell a hedge trimmer to someone who
then cuts off their fingers? I would be very surprised if that
Hi Neil
Bottom Line: Don't put unverifiable data into OSM.
I've always been against underground cables/pipes. The utility companies
can't even map them accurately when they're being constructed! Drawing a
straight line between two stations on, basically, as guess, adds no
quality. They
On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
Do we need an OSM disclaimer
The copyright page does include:
Inclusion of data in OpenStreetMap does not imply that the original data
provider endorses OpenStreetMap, provides any warranty, or accepts any
liability.
On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
[snip]
I guess we might need to be a little careful:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/one-spelling-error-costs-companies-house-up-to-9-million-after-being-sued-for-ruining-business-10007372.html
--
Steve
---
This email has been checked
That's because Companies House are the official legal arbiters of who is, or is
not, a legally trading company and thus have the ultimate responsibility.
On 28 Jan 2015, at 14:44, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
[snip]
I guess we
And car manufacturers are legally responsible for 4 deaths every year?
They'd soon be out of business if so. I can't believe that lending your
neighbour a piece of equipment in good working order would make you responsible
for injury. If you knew it was damaged, however, and did not make
If you sold the ladder to your neighbour, you'd be ok cos then it'd be his
ladder to do what he wanted with it - and you'd lose the liability as you
couldn't prevent him doing whatever he likes with his ladder. That's the
big difference. Best thing then is only to *sell *info on OSM map..
On 28
On 28/01/15 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
Do we need an OSM disclaimer -- I've just had a mail from a gentleman
enquiring why an underground powerline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127968407/history#map=17/51.50283/-2.55462
was drawn on OSM -- as he didn't want to buy a house on top of it and
True - not even footpaths go where OS shows they do !
On 28 January 2015 at 15:41, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 28/01/15 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
Do we need an OSM disclaimer -- I've just had a mail from a gentleman
enquiring why an underground powerline
13 matches
Mail list logo
