You say there's no neutrality, but there's no option to disagree with
the whole proposal.
On 11/07/2015 21:19, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Dear UK/GB OpenStreetMappers,
From time to time we talk about the potential of setting up a UK/GB
OpenStreetMap group (name yet to be decided) but we never
Bridges and other significant remaining infrastructure of railways tagged
as railway=abandoned ceased to be rendered on the Standard rendering some
time ago. There was a degree of dissension with this decision:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/542.
Certainly I recall a few
On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 10:25 +0100, SK53 wrote:
Bridges and other significant remaining infrastructure of railways
tagged as railway=abandoned ceased to be rendered on the Standard
rendering some time ago. There was a degree of dissension with this
decision:
…and what does “support the development of OSM tools and apps” mean in this
context? Support in the sense that we think its great and will promote / aid /
assist, or support in the sense that we hand over a sum of money towards
development? And in that case, where does it come from? The
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:53:57AM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
The significant (and massive) disused railway viaduct near Thrapston:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970
does not render on our default map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.3914/-0.5433
despite being
Ah, that's a bit annoying.
This is also a significant structure:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38331305
Not least as a tourist attraction for fans of the film 'The Titfield
Thunderbolt' which was made along this stretch of line.
It can't be too hard to the carto scheme to check
On 13 July 2015 at 10:37, thomas van der veen th.vanderv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hockley Viaduct near Winchester does get rendered:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108241777#map=18/51.03628/-1.32230
but probably because there is a path on it. Would that be a workaround for
you Andy?
Thank
Hockley Viaduct near Winchester does get rendered:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108241777#map=18/51.03628/-1.32230
but probably because there is a path on it. Would that be a workaround for
you Andy?
Thomas
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:25 AM, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Bridges and
On 13/07/2015 17:46, Paul Sladen wrote:
Any UK-specific rendering is not going to solve the core issue: that
large numbers of perfectly extent bridges and tunnels are not
rendered; Most of these old tunnels in Nottingham are not rendered:
Relation: Tunnels of Nottingham
Andy Townsend wrote:
OSM's standard map is currently trying to be the primary
feedback mechanism to mappers but also have clear
design (1). I genuinely don't believe that you can do both
well in one map style.
I think you can, but it requires serious cartographical chops, and - ideally
-
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:40:26 +0100
ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:53:57AM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
The significant (and massive) disused railway viaduct near Thrapston:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970
does not render on our default
On 13 July 2015 at 14:34, Mike Evans mi...@saxicola.co.uk wrote:
It seems to me that the viaduct and the railway are two separate entities and
should mapped as such. Just because an abandoned railway happens to run on
the top of the viaduct is irrelevant in my opinion.
Exactly. If there was
Find out first if people want it, rather than ask how they think it
should be implemented.
On 13/07/2015 14:03, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 13 July 2015 at 12:39, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
there's no option to disagree with the whole proposal
What
Dave,
I don't think anyone has a veto. Why would it harm you if this went ahead?
On 13 July 2015 19:00:56 GMT+01:00, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Find out first if people want it, rather than ask how they think it
should be implemented.
On 13/07/2015 14:03, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 13
That doesn't get recorded.
On 13/07/2015 17:18, Andy Robinson wrote:
It’s easy to disagree with a proposal. You simply ignore it. J
*From:*Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
*Sent:* 13 July 2015 12:40
*To:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Survey: A UK/GB OpenStreetMap
On 13/07/15 16:09, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I think this, and blue motorways, is a good argument for why we need a
UK render of the map.
I agree a UK-specific rendering would be very useful, especially now
the Default style is getting less and less UK-centric.
Seconded ...
While the main
On 13 July 2015 at 14:13, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I think this, and blue motorways, is a good argument for why we need a
UK render of the map.
I agree a UK-specific rendering would be very useful, especially now
the Default style is getting less and less UK-centric.
--
It’s easy to disagree with a proposal. You simply ignore it. J
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 13 July 2015 12:40
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Survey: A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group?
You say there's no neutrality, but there's no option to disagree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 13 July 2015 at 14:13, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I think this, and blue motorways,
I agree a UK-specific rendering would be very useful,
I fear that there is a risk the original
Hi all,
As I'm not signed up to all mailing lists, can I please have volunteers to
forward this to talk-gb-london, talk-gb-midanglia, talk-gb-thenorth and
talk-scotland?
Thanks,
Rob
On 11 July 2015 at 21:19, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear UK/GB OpenStreetMappers,
From
On 13 July 2015 at 19:00, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Find out first if people want it
That they do is already evident.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
On 07/13/2015 08:08 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I don't think anyone has a veto. Why would it harm you if this went ahead?
I think I can see why Dave F might have an issue with the whole thing.
Rob has phrased it as a question: A UK/GB group? and also in his
message he says ... should a group be
On Mon Jul 13 19:07:35 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote:
Curious: Why don't you think blue for motorways is acceptable?
Blue is the correct colour for motorways, I was referring to the coming carto
change where they will become orange.
Phil (trigpoint )
On 13/07/2015 13:13, Philip Barnes
The significant (and massive) disused railway viaduct near Thrapston:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264894970
does not render on our default map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.3914/-0.5433
despite being a significant and very visible landmark:
On 13 July 2015 at 09:53, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
I don't want fudge things to just tag for the renderer, but is there
a relevant tag missing, or should we change the rendering styles to
show such objects?
You might be interested in this PR which is currently under
25 matches
Mail list logo
