Much clearer, thanks
DaveF
On 30/10/2016 14:00, Greg wrote:
Good point, Dave. The first graph previously included only OSM
nodes/ways which had been fully matched with fhrs:id and postcode but
I have now amended the first graph and the ‘overall %’ graph to show
nodes/ways with a
Good point, Dave. The first graph previously included only OSM nodes/ways which
had been fully matched with fhrs:id and postcode but I have now amended the
first graph and the ‘overall %’ graph to show nodes/ways with a
mismatched/missing postcode too.
If anyone would like to improve the
2 matches
Mail list logo
