Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 18:11 +0100, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote: > > Hi all, > > I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for > NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by > mistake, in this changeset

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote: Hi all, I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by mistake, in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118 445. Is there a way to

[Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Adam Snape
Hi all, I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by mistake, in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118445. Is there a way to reinstate it without manually re-adding all the contituent

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging "Shared space" roads (Preston City Centre)

2017-10-09 Thread Adam Snape
Okay, To summarise the discussion so far. Most respondents thought that highway=living_street was not the correct tag for shared use. Nobody explicitly supported this usage. Most seemed to think that there should be a specific tag for shared use to be used in addition to established tags such as