On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 18:11 +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for
> NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by
> mistake, in this changeset
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for
NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by
mistake, in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118
445. Is there a way to
Hi all,
I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for NCN
55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by mistake, in
this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118445. Is there a
way to reinstate it without manually re-adding all the contituent
Okay, To summarise the discussion so far. Most respondents thought that
highway=living_street was not the correct tag for shared use. Nobody
explicitly supported this usage. Most seemed to think that there should be
a specific tag for shared use to be used in addition to established tags
such as
4 matches
Mail list logo