Hi
Comments inline.
On 04/11/2017 20:07, Adam Snape wrote:
Hi,
I'm of the view that using a standard format would be rather unlikely
to result in confusion in correspondence with the LA, but am equally
happy with using the LA's version. Some thoughts:
1. We definitely shouldn't attempt
Hi,
I'm of the view that using a standard format would be rather unlikely to
result in confusion in correspondence with the LA, but am equally happy
with using the LA's version. Some thoughts:
1. We definitely shouldn't attempt to amend the definitive map 'parish' to
correspond to modern civil
Hi
I've started adding Prow_ref=* to the paths within my Local Authority.
I've been using the format as decided by them.
I noticed another mapper has already added a few, but using the format
by Barry Cornelius at rowmaps.com. I think this shouldn't be used as
it's Barry's own concoction.
Hi all,
A few years ago the Mappa Mercia group decided to make our December meeting
a "Christmas curry". We discussed the same idea this week.
We'd love for others to join us. I guess it will be first Thursday of
December unless there is an outcry for a different date.
Anyone up for it?
Hi all,
A few years ago the Mappa Mercia group decided to make our December meeting
a "Christmas curry". We discussed the same idea this week.
We'd love for others to join us. I guess it will be first Thursday of
December unless there is an outcry for a different date.
Anyone up for it?
Hi Ilya,
I think some more attention needs putting on the creation of new/missing fuel
stations.
Some issues I've come across:
Around:
http://bl.ocks.org/Zverik/raw/ddcfaf2da25a3dfda00a3d93a62f218d/#18/50.85426/-1.73008
Looks like it will attempt to create a node over the top of an existing
6 matches
Mail list logo
