My experience has been that although a missing FHRS entry is a useful warning
of what to resurvey, there are too many false positives to remove businesses
without checking on the ground.
--
Andrew
From: Gregrs
Sent: 21 January 2018
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:58:37PM +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
I don't think it has been mentioned, but having the link to FHRS is one
way of keeping on top of changes in places where we have fewer active
mappers. That is, by monitoring for changes in FHRS we can identify
closures,
Hi all,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 01:12:07PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
If there has been a change of ownership, then yes, the old FHRS rating
doesn't carry over to the new one. So it would need to be deleted from
OSM as well.
Whilst it's great to include the fhrs:id for an establishment and
Thanks everyone
The pub I was looking at has a FHRS reference under its new name as
"awaiting inspection". This is useful confirmation that its old inspection
is not valid.
On 21 January 2018 at 15:58, Rob Nickerson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it has been
P.S. the leaflet is an updated version of the one that has been translated
an adapted over the years. It now looks like this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_flyer_FOSSGIS_2017_English.jpeg
*Rob*
On 21 January 2018 at 16:03, Rob Nickerson
wrote:
> Hi
Hi - good work. One thing not mentioned on that website - is there any
particular use you'd like to see? Are there particular things in need
of recording this way, eg urban or rural, high-traffic or low-traffic?
Best
Dan
2018-01-21 16:03 GMT+00:00 Rob Nickerson :
> Hi
Hi all,
In case you missed it in the recent OSM UK newsletter, the 360 camera is
now available to rent. Please see
https://osmuk.org/360-degree-camera-rental/
And as a reminder, thanks to the generosity of our friends in Germany, we
still have plenty of the OSM leaflets to distribute. I will
Hi,
I don't think it has been mentioned, but having the link to FHRS is one way
of keeping on top of changes in places where we have fewer active mappers.
That is, by monitoring for changes in FHRS we can identify closures,
takeovers, new cafes etc (assuming a detectable change in the source
On 20/01/2018 22:39, Andrew Black wrote:
If a pub has been taken over by a chain (and changed name), should one
delete FHRS info.
My gut feeling is yes but. ...
If there has been a change of ownership, then yes, the old FHRS rating
doesn't carry over to the new one. So it would need to be
2018-01-21 12:14 GMT+00:00 Dave F :
>
> On 21/01/2018 12:09, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> rarely accepted by the locals,...
>
>
> loc_name
IMHO keeping one old_name is good practice, in particular to allow a
little lag time for people who might search OSM data for "the
On 21/01/2018 12:09, Philip Barnes wrote:
rarely accepted by the locals,...
loc_name
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 00:39 +, Dave F wrote:
> Bearing in mind OSM isn't a historical database, how far back
> should
> we go with old:?
These things are worth keeping, trendy names dreamed up by marketing
types are rarely accepted by the locals, they will go on referring to a
pub by
Hi all,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:36:34AM +, Dave F wrote:
I've been prefixing them with disused: as the fhrs:id will be probably
be updated after a new review. I found keeping the old one was useful
as a checking reference.
Prefixing with disused, old or not could be useful. (I
13 matches
Mail list logo