On 04/10/2019 00:26, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
I think you're missing the point. Most contributors believe postcodes
on buildings or property nodes, add quality to the OSM's database, but
object to the import of codepoint as it's just not accurate enough as
stated in this, & numerous other
I think you're missing the point. Most contributors believe postcodes on
buildings or property nodes, add quality to the OSM's database, but
object to the import of codepoint as it's just not accurate enough as
stated in this, & numerous other threads.
There's no point in importing to stand
On 03/10/2019 09:26, Mark Goodge wrote:
- The key (and deliberate) limitation Code-Point Open is that it
doesn't distinguish between residential postcodes and postcodes
assigned to "large users". This is not ideal but still useful - we
know the postcode exists at a given location, we just
On 29/09/2019 21:58, Edward Bainton wrote:
> running from 511,025.344 298,855.444 Meters to 510,856.672
298,723.814 Meters
>
> I don't recognise that coordinate system: is it any help for OSM?
It's a millimetre-precision version of the Ordnance Survey grid
reference. For conversion, see e.g.
On 03/10/2019 01:40, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
- Code-Point Open is a legal and open source of postcode data. In fact
it is the _only_ legal source of such data in bulk. All other sources
are either derived from CPO or are based on local knowledge.
That's not true. The ONS Postcode
5 matches
Mail list logo
