Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Dave F via Talk-GB
Why country codes? OSM is geospatially aware. On 09/04/2020 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:26, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:21, Tony OSM wrote: If the data is to be in the public domain the next step has to be tagging. Do

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Mark Goodge
On 10/04/2020 17:37, Brian Prangle wrote: Can I ask two  basic daft questions? What use are these in OSM if we only pick at them instead of importing the lot ( which is  highly unlikely)? UPRNs will be useful on any mapped building or area, as it will help link OSM data to other datasets

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Lester Caine
On 10/04/2020 17:37, Brian Prangle wrote: Can I ask two  basic daft questions? Perfectly reasonable questions ... What use are these in OSM if we only pick at them instead of importing the lot ( which is  highly unlikely)? I'll repeat that we do need to wait and see exactly what will be

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Brian Prangle
Can I ask two basic daft questions? What use are these in OSM if we only pick at them instead of importing the lot ( which is highly unlikely)? Is it possible to derive street names from USRN in a way that is licence compatible? Regards Brian On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 13:14, Mark Goodge wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Mark Goodge
On 09/04/2020 20:58, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote: If uprn is supposed to denote an address, why not simply use addr:uprn? It doesn't denote an address. While a lot of premises that have a UPRN also have an address, there are also many that don't. Every individual field in an agricultural

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Tony OSM
Prefer capitalised ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn as wikipage for ref https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref shows towards the end that US and FR are used to build up refs, FR has a page showing all their ref's

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] NHS Nightingale Birmingham

2020-04-10 Thread Andy Mabbett
Does anyone know which hall(s) of the NEC the new NHS Nightingale Birmingham is in? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Lester Caine
On 10/04/2020 08:04, Jez Nicholson wrote: I don't think they meant 'replace an address with addr:uprn', just enhance it. I was not being as clear as I should have been. A UPRN parcel of land or object includes those for which an address is not appropriate and which 'Royal Mail' would never

Re: [Talk-GB] Q2 2020 Quarterly project GP Surgeries and health sites

2020-04-10 Thread Edward Bainton
Sorry to come late to this party. It would also be useful to indicate morgues & their capacity, if people have access to that information. Eg, most mosques have one. Schedule 28 Coronavirus Act gives powers to local authorities to demand this information. Would be good if it were there in

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

2020-04-10 Thread Jez Nicholson
I don't think they meant 'replace an address with addr:uprn', just enhance it. On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, 21:37 Lester Caine, wrote: > On 09/04/2020 20:58, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote: > > If uprn is supposed to denote an address, why not simply use addr:uprn? > There is no intention that UPRN will