Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

Hi Richard, Hi all, (Sorry for not replying properly to the thread - I don't receive the emails into my inbox and nabble is complaining about a broken certificate today) It sounds like you are making good progress. Thanks for all the written documentation for those, like myself, who are not so

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

Sorry if I did not make myself clear enough.  (Every day is a new learning opportunity!) At least it's good to know that I have not broken the system :-) Regards,Peter On Monday, 27 April 2020, 11:24:14 BST, Andy Townsend wrote: On 27/04/2020 11:16, Peter Neale wrote: It

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 11:16, Peter Neale wrote: It seems that we have had 2 of us attempting the same change at the same time. Generally speaking, IRC's better for this sort of request as everyone sees what's happening in real time I hope that the database change  control can cope with this.

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

Noted.  I have been careful to separate the ways sharing points and only delete the way in question. Regards,Peter Peter Neale t: 01908 309666 m: 07968 341930 skype: nealepb On Monday, 27 April 2020, 10:56:40 BST, Jez Nicholson wrote: Note that the vast majority of the points in

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

A big thank you form me to everyone who sorted this out :) On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 AM Andy Townsend wrote: > On 27/04/2020 11:09, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: > > I THINK I have done it. > > It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was > able to cut the

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

It seems that we have had 2 of us attempting the same change at the same time.  I hope that the database change  control can cope with this. I did try to avoid such a clash by responding here before starting work. Regards,Peter On Monday, 27 April 2020, 11:12:59 BST, Andy Townsend

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 11:09, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: I THINK I have done it. It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was able to cut the offending line and delete a section at a time (which fitted on the screen). That definitely sounds like "the hard way" :) It

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 10:56, Jez Nicholson wrote: Note that the vast majority of the points in the Way were pre-existing. Any fix should leave them in place. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:54 AM nathan case > wrote: I’m fairly sure Potlach (assuming you want to tackle

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

I THINK I have done it.   It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was able to cut the offending line and delete a section at a time (which fitted on the screen). I hope that I have not disturbed anything else in the process.   Regards,Peter Peter Neale t: 01908

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

Note that the vast majority of the points in the Way were pre-existing. Any fix should leave them in place. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:54 AM nathan case wrote: > I’m fairly sure Potlach (assuming you want to tackle this via a browser > editor) allows you to delete larger areas in one go –

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

I’m fairly sure Potlach (assuming you want to tackle this via a browser editor) allows you to delete larger areas in one go – rather than deleting point by point. Cheers. From: Peter Neale via Talk-GB Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 10:43 AM To: Talk-GB ; Jez Nicholson Subject: Re: [Talk-GB]

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

I think that I understand the issue.  A solution may be to delete individual points until the whole way is small enough to be shown on a screen at editable zoom.   I am happy to spend a while trying this, but it is probably best if only one of us is stirring the pot at once. Regards,Peter

[Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

A new user has created a new way in Brighton to indicate the Hollingbury residential error https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785162533 They freely admit their error but are unable to remove it, as am I. Would anyone be able to assist please? I only have anecdotal evidence (like this one) but it

Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art

There may also be merit in tagging a location that is frequently / consistently used for more ephemeral art.  Any time you visit, you can reasonably expect to see something, but it might be a different thing from what was there yesterday. Regards,Peter On Monday, 27 April 2020, 10:07:37 BST,

Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art

These things can be permanent – mosaic or other types of inlay. From: Mike ParfittSent: 27 April 2020 08:56To: mar...@templot.com; neal...@yahoo.co.uk; talk-gb@openstreetmap.orgSubject: Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art There may be some merit in tagging permanent artwork on the sides of buildings.But

[Talk-GB] war graves / Remembrance day event

This is related to the CWGC / war graves discussion[1] but I felt it is worth a separate thread Last year we had the hackathon in Kosovo on the weekend ahead of Remembrance day It could be interesting to do similar things this year. It could be online or in any one or more locations. If

Re: [Talk-GB] underfoot art

There may be some merit in tagging permanent artwork on the sides of buildings. But tagging pavement/street art that will vanish after a couple of showers seems pointless. From: Peter Neale via Talk-GB Sent: 26 April 2020 18:38:06 To: mar...@templot.com Cc: