Could the data be included in https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ ?
On 21/07/2020 22:42, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-07-21 22:54, Mark Goodge wrote:
It's the errors which are more of a problem, because it's generally
better not to map something than to map it wrongly.
This is a difficult point.
On 2020-07-21 22:54, Mark Goodge wrote:
> It's the errors which are more of a problem, because it's generally better
> not to map something than to map it wrongly.
This is a difficult point. Data is never 100% complete, and frequently
not 100% accurate. At what point it becomes better not to
On 21/07/2020 21:54, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 21:27, ael wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:30:25PM +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough
On 21/07/2020 21:27, ael wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:30:25PM +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough letter?
It is open, it's OGL now. But
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 05:30:25PM +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
>
> On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
> > Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
> > somebody should write a nice enough letter?
>
> It is open, it's OGL now. But it's not reliable
On 21/07/2020 20:56, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 21/07/2020 17:30, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough letter?
It is open, it's OGL now. But it's
On 21/07/2020 17:30, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough letter?
It is open, it's OGL now. But it's not reliable enough for an
unfiltered bulk import;
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 17:30 +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
> But it's not reliable enough for an unfiltered bulk import; there are
> duplicate entries, incorrect coordinates and incorrect or missing
> addresses.
We could turn this into an advantage of Open Data and OSM. Validation
of other datasets
Again, this sounds like a perfect job for MapRoulette where the NCR goes into a
GeoJSON and people get to work on that data with what's in OSM already - the
part that requires effort is to correct what's bogus ;)
K
Am 21. Juli 2020 18:30:25 MESZ schrieb Mark Goodge :
>
>
>On 21/07/2020 16:57,
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough letter?
It is open, it's OGL now. But it's not reliable enough for an unfiltered
bulk import; there are duplicate entries, incorrect
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not somebody
should write a nice enough letter?
Kai
Am 21. Juli 2020 17:16:59 MESZ schrieb Mark Goodge :
>
>
>On 21/07/2020 12:58, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>> 1538 nationwide.
>
>Which is a long way short of the 10,000+ listed in
On 21/07/2020 12:58, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
1538 nationwide.
Which is a long way short of the 10,000+ listed in the National
Chargepoint Registry.
Use this to see what other tags contributors are adding.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Wia
It seems to be patchy, and very dependent on
On 21/07/2020 12:42, Nick wrote:
Hi Lester
Rob has suggested a matching USRN tag
You make a good point regarding upper and lower case. Perhaps the tag
should be ref:GB:UPRN in line with normal convention of referring to
UPRN in upper case?
I was only thinking about the country code as I've
Yes, am reasonably familiar with ones in Notts & Derbys. A friend led the
initial survey work (Phase 1 habitat) back in the 1970s, other friends were
surveyors.
Some LAs do have these as data on their GIS systems (Nottingham &
Nottinghamshire for instance), others have lists (RBWM). I understand
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:58:53AM +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
> Do we map electric vehicle charging points?
Yes.
ael
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Part of highway=street_lamp, similarly to street lamps mounted on power poles.
Though it is yet another case of tricky difference between fuel stations that
have quite standard
size and charging spots ranging in size from such minor ones to bigger
features...
Jul 21, 2020, 14:47 by
My Council has introduced 200+ lamp post mounted charging points
https://www.instagram.com/p/B_Fm7L8nOL8/
Would you give that its own node? or as part of Tag:highway=street_lamp?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:13 PM Dave F via Talk-GB <
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 21/07/2020 12:10, Chris
On 21/07/2020 12:10, Chris Hill wrote:
Leccy car drivers need to know if the point is working. Apps from the
charge point suppliers and from others such as Zapmap try to keep
drivers informed about the availability and condition of the point.
OSM doesn't have that info and can't update it in
On 21/07/2020 12:03, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
Hi Mark,
there's a pretty detailled article in the wiki for e-charging and all the
options that come with it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
So yeah, I guess, mapping them is totally OK.
Kai
Mark Goodge hat am
1538 nationwide.
Use this to see what other tags contributors are adding.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Wia
DaveF
On 21/07/2020 11:58, Mark Goodge wrote:
Do we map electric vehicle charging points? If not, should we?
None of the ones in my town are on OSM, at the moment. I could add
them,
Hi Lester
Rob has suggested a matching USRN tag
You make a good point regarding upper and lower case. Perhaps the tag
should be ref:GB:UPRN in line with normal convention of referring to
UPRN in upper case?
Nick
On 21/07/2020 10:34, Lester Caine wrote:
On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson
Leccy car drivers need to know if the point is working. Apps from the charge
point suppliers and from others such as Zapmap try to keep drivers informed
about the availability and condition of the point. OSM doesn't have that info
and can't update it in real time. Some leccy cars have this live
Hi Mark,
there's a pretty detailled article in the wiki for e-charging and all the
options that come with it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
So yeah, I guess, mapping them is totally OK.
Kai
> Mark Goodge hat am 21. Juli 2020 um 12:58 geschrieben:
>
>
>
I’ve been adding them in My area. The tagging is established
Sent from my iPhone
> On 21 Jul 2020, at 12:00, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> Do we map electric vehicle charging points? If not, should we?
>
> None of the ones in my town are on OSM, at the moment. I could add them, but
> it seems a
Do we map electric vehicle charging points? If not, should we?
None of the ones in my town are on OSM, at the moment. I could add them,
but it seems a bit pointless if they're not generally mapped.
Mark
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson wrote:
If there are no red flags I will move for a vote.
Looks sensible to me but will there be a matching usrn tag?
I see the occasional use of :gb: on other tags and any 'convention' on
upper or lower case is possibly an international one, but I'm not sure
Excellent proposal. No problems that I can see.
Peter
>On Tuesday, 21 July 2020, 09:18:02 BST, Tony OSM
wrote:
>Thanks for the effort.
>No problem to vote for this, no "red flags" for me.
>Tony
>>On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>As discussed at
Thanks for the effort.
No problem to vote for this, no "red flags" for me.
Tony
On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed at the State of the Map online workshop, I took away an
action to draft a proposal page for ref:GB:uprn. This page is now up
online.
28 matches
Mail list logo
