Re: [Talk-GB] Admin Boundaries and Combined Authorities

2020-07-27 Thread Steve Doerr
Could they perhaps be 5.5 to distinguish them from regions? Steve From: Brian Prangle [mailto:bpran...@gmail.com] I favour admin level 5 too. On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 23:52, Colin Smale mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> > wrote: The LAs of which the CAs are composed are sometimes

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin Boundaries and Combined Authorities

2020-07-27 Thread Brian Prangle
I favour admin level 5 too. West Midlands CA is tagged as 6 which was a pure estimate by me as being at least equivalent to the constituent LA members. Transport is a heck of a slice of its budget and function (capital £300m and operating £100m) It also plays a big role in economic development

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin Boundaries and Combined Authorities

2020-07-27 Thread Colin Smale
For England (i.e. not Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland): * at admin level 6, there should be full coverage, either as an administrative county or a unitary authority * at admin level 8, partial coverage - full within administrative counties, none within unitary authorities

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin Boundaries and Combined Authorities

2020-07-27 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 7/27/20 00:50, Colin Smale wrote: > If they are accepted as boundary=administrative, what admin level should > be used? The LAs of which the CAs are composed are sometimes > Metropolitan Boroughs with admin_level=8, and sometimes Unitary > Authorities with admin_level=6. I am tending