On 14/12/2020 19:21, Edward Bainton wrote:
Glad I'm not going mad. Does it say anything useful or interesting
that the "GPS trace" is a few metres away from the boundary as marked
on the map? (Sorry if this has been answered recently: there was
extensive discussion on alignment not long ago,
Either a datum mix-up or different roundings used in the constants for
the back-and-forth conversion. Either way that's not a real trace
On 14/12/2020 19:33, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-12-14 20:21, Edward Bainton wrote:
With plenty of portages...
Glad I'm not going mad. Does it say
On 2020-12-14 20:21, Edward Bainton wrote:
> With plenty of portages...
>
> Glad I'm not going mad. Does it say anything useful or interesting that the
> "GPS trace" is a few metres away from the boundary as marked on the map?
> (Sorry if this has been answered recently: there was extensive
With plenty of portages...
Glad I'm not going mad. Does it say anything useful or interesting that the
"GPS trace" is a few metres away from the boundary as marked on the map?
(Sorry if this has been answered recently: there was extensive discussion
on alignment not long ago, but too technical
On 14/12/2020 17:49, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 14/12/2020 17:27, Edward Bainton wrote:
Any thoughts on why when I enable "public GPS traces" in iD, I get one
that
near enough exactly tracks the LA boundary South Kesteven:Peterborough
(at
Deeping St James)?
Someone took their tracker with
On 14/12/2020 17:27, Edward Bainton wrote:
Any thoughts on why when I enable "public GPS traces" in iD, I get one that
near enough exactly tracks the LA boundary South Kesteven:Peterborough (at
Deeping St James)?
Someone took their tracker with them when "Beating the Bounds"?
I suspect someone has uploaded a GPX version of the boundary from OS
Boundary-Line. It doesn't look like an actual trace from a GPS receiver.
On 2020-12-14 18:27, Edward Bainton wrote:
> Any thoughts on why when I enable "public GPS traces" in iD, I get one that
> near enough exactly tracks
Any thoughts on why when I enable "public GPS traces" in iD, I get one that
near enough exactly tracks the LA boundary South Kesteven:Peterborough (at
Deeping St James)?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.6543/-0.2655=G
It seems unlikey that it really is a GPS trace - or is it?
8 matches
Mail list logo
