Re: [Talk-GB] [Spam] oslVosm, OpenData Locator 2010 data and not:name

2010-10-04 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Of Peter Miller Sent: 04 October 2010 10:15 AM To: Tim Francois Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] [Spam] oslVosm,OpenData Locator 2010 data and not:name great news. Regarding the not:name tag at the OS, I think we need to be a bit patient. The OS is a large organisation and do take

Re: [Talk-GB] [Spam] oslVosm, OpenData Locator 2010 data and not:name

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Miller
great news. Regarding the not:name tag at the OS, I think we need to be a bit patient. The OS is a large organisation and do take time to change. They are actually changing fast at present and have expressed enthusiasm for the not:name technique and I think it is just a matter of us using it for

Re: [Talk-GB] [Spam] oslVosm, OpenData Locator 2010 data and not:name

2010-10-04 Thread Tim Francois
It would indeed be a shame if we/they just ignored the not:name data - I grep'd the current Great Britain OSM dataset and there's 1054 instances of k=not:name, which is not insignificant. (If anyone wants to see the results download it in zipped txt format http://tm.com/osm/goog_1770857475