Maybe add a note on both Bartholemews / Avenue and perhaps an
alt_name="Bartholemews Avenue" on both too (doesn't seem like something
that would easily be reconstructed by Nominatim)?
Neil
On 26/07/2018 17:11, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
>
> On 26/07/2018 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
>> > And, since
On 26/07/2018 16:39, Martin Wynne wrote:
> And, since that also matches what's on the ground,
What's on the ground is that a property in Avenue has a postal address
in East Street, so maybe Avenue is simply a part of East Street and
should be mapped as "East Street"?
It is in the normal
And calling city council officers idiots is not the most helpful of
changeset comment.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 16:39 Martin Wynne, wrote:
> > And, since that also matches what's on the ground,
>
> What's on the ground is that a property in Avenue has a postal address
> in East Street, so maybe
> And, since that also matches what's on the ground,
What's on the ground is that a property in Avenue has a postal address
in East Street, so maybe Avenue is simply a part of East Street and
should be mapped as "East Street"?
It is in the normal run of East Street numbers - 60 not 60A:
On 26/07/2018 13:32, Paul Berry wrote:
I can't help but think this changeset is misguided for a number of
reasons. However I'm nowhere near Brighton so not really in a position
to verify other than from memory and some armchair detective work.
To wit:
> I guess it hasn't caused a problem because AFAIK
> there aren't any addresses in 'Avenue'.
Engraved in stone:
https://goo.gl/maps/EXgJxpmjesn
That number 60 address is part of East Street:
http://www.cutemedia.com/contact/
Martin.
___
I am in Brighton and had wondered about the 'Avenue' road sign
https://goo.gl/maps/sf1fv2tJbav (and the 'Bartholomews' road sign on the
Town Hall)
I guess it hasn't caused a problem because AFAIK there aren't any addresses
in 'Avenue'. Graves and Pilcher Estate Agents is on the Old Steine. All
On 26/07/18 13:32, Paul Berry wrote:
I can't help but think this changeset is misguided for a number of
reasons. However I'm nowhere near Brighton so not really in a position
to verify other than from memory and some armchair detective work.
To wit:
I can't help but think this changeset is misguided for a number of reasons.
However I'm nowhere near Brighton so not really in a position to verify
other than from memory and some armchair detective work.
To wit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59687846
So, two ways: "Bartholomews" and
9 matches
Mail list logo
