What is actually meant by 'Rights of Way Data' here?
As per the online maps [1] it also includes:
. Long Distance Routes
. Countryside Services
. District Boundaries
Are these part of the Open Data release as well?
Note they don't appear in the KML download that I've looked at. (I've not
I have looked at the ESRI shapefile and can confirm that it contains just
the Public Rights of Way [1] too. None of the extra bits you identified
below (however this was expected as it is all we asked for). Long distance
trials are in the Natural England data set, boundaries in the OS OpenData
Hello everyone,
Some good news! As from yesterday, Hampshire County Council have released their
Rights of Way data under the OS OpenData licence.
Details here:
http://www3.hants.gov.uk/communications/mediacentre/mediareleases.htm?newsid=534104
Slippy map, and downloadable raw data (shp or kml
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Some good news! As from yesterday, Hampshire County
Council have released their Rights of Way data under the
OS OpenData licence.
\o/
If so, I'd imagine what we need to do is:
- convert this data to .osm files with OSM tagging, and
- manually (not automatically!)
On 31 May 2012 10:46, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
I think we can import OS OpenData stuff into OSM can't we?
We can certainly use OS's OS OpenData products (with the exception of
CodePoint Open) in OSM because LWG obtained explicit permission from
Ordnance Survey to do so.
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:46 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Some good news! As from yesterday, Hampshire County Council have released
their Rights of Way data under the OS OpenData licence.
Good news indeed.
This must be the reason why they've been too busy to answer my licensing
query despite
Hence, unfortunately, I don't think we can use the Hampshire data
(going forward under ODbL) unless we get explicit permission from the
copyright holders. For the maps, this would presumably mean both the
council and OS. It's a real pain that OS felt it necessary to fork the
Open Government
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:16 +0100, Andy Street wrote:
While I believe that this data release is a good thing may I take this
opportunity to remind people that legality is not always reality. If
you
intend to use this dataset then please do a ground survey to ensure
that
the path actually
Andy Street wrote:
... do a ground survey to ensure that the path actually follows the
route recorded in the definitive map.
... or use a source tag to make it clear where it's come from and that a
ground survey hasn't been done there? I'm sure that there'll be places
where a right of way
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:29 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hence, unfortunately, I don't think we can use the Hampshire data
(going forward under ODbL) unless we get explicit permission from the
copyright holders. For the maps, this would presumably mean both the
council and OS. It's a real pain
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OS
OpenData licence
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:29 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hence
Hi Nick,
Whilst the legal side is being discussed, I notice that the press release
makes no reference to the Definitive Statement. Did you ask about this? /
Have you had any direct response from the Council?
Regards,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
