Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-19 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 12:22 +0100, SK53 wrote: > Seems my earlier email was a timely reminder, We seem to be down to > over 4,500 now. I know I can't have done more than a couple of > thousand of these. I have certainly seen evidence that these are simply being armchaired with no particular

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-19 Thread Dave F
On 19/05/2017 12:22, SK53 wrote: We still have a very large number of place=farm, but I suspect these are much harder to resolve as many will be former farms which are now residential. Many, perhaps the bulk, of these have been added from OS OpenStreetView data. place=farm will be harder

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-19 Thread SK53
Seems my earlier email was a timely reminder, We seem to be down to over 4,500 now. I know I can't have done more than a couple of thousand of these. We still have a very large number of place=farm, but I suspect these are much harder to

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Walter Nordmann
Yes, UK is still waiting for cleanup - and i think the UK community should fix that.: https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/nofarm_gbr_2017_05_16.png https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/nofarm_eu_2017_05_16.png

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread SK53
I dont think there is any need: like replacing old-style multipolygons this is now a global ongoing project. Jerry On 16 May 2017 at 15:23, Brian Prangle wrote: > Yes we did and this discussion is a re-run of the points raised then - not > that there's anything wrong with

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Brian Prangle
Yes we did and this discussion is a re-run of the points raised then - not that there's anything wrong with re-running discussions. If folk feel that this is a pressing problem then we could run another Quarterly Project with the same aim. On 16 May 2017 at 15:17, Jez Nicholson

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Jez Nicholson
Didn't we have this as a quarterly project last year? Could another one be proposed? On Tue, 16 May 2017 14:36 Dave F, wrote: > > On 16/05/2017 13:30, SK53 wrote: > > My experience is that roughly 5-10% of the polygons will be > > landuse=farmyard, and the vast

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Dave F
On 16/05/2017 13:30, SK53 wrote: My experience is that roughly 5-10% of the polygons will be landuse=farmyard, and the vast majority landuse=farmland. Watch for farm buildings tagged with landuse though. To go with that there's the misuse of place=farm to represent a farmyard. DaveF

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Paul Berry
Apologies, I have just found: https://wambachers-osm.website/nofarm/#layer=OpenStreetMap.org=FFT Regards, *Paul* On 16 May 2017 at 14:32, Paul Berry wrote: > Jerry, > > Is there a quick way of seeing what needs fixing for a given area without > running Overpass multiple

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread Paul Berry
Jerry, Is there a quick way of seeing what needs fixing for a given area without running Overpass multiple times? Regards, *Paul* On 16 May 2017 at 13:30, SK53 wrote: > I just happened to notice on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/NoFarm_cleanup_efforts)

[Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

2017-05-16 Thread SK53
I just happened to notice on the Wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NoFarm_cleanup_efforts) that the UK is still rather high up the laggards board for fixing landuse=farm to something more appropriate. Some areas look good (East & West Mids), but there tend to be strong concentrations of