It is difficult to chase tainted junctions though.
--
Andrew
I've knocked something together as a trial for tainted junctions. My
scripts extract the nodes at the start and end of a given set of ways
and pass them through quick history to check the licence state.
So far I've done
On 8 March 2012 15:19, MarkS o...@redcake.co.uk wrote:
I've done an update and put some info on a wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MarkS/Remapping
The page has the latest counts (down to 1889 currently expected to be
deleted). It also has a link to a CSV file with the
Robert asked:
Does your CSV list take into account ways tagged with ODbL=clean?
Checking taginfo and then double checking by asking on #irc, but as
tags are case sensitive a quick reminder that it is
odbl=clean
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=odbl
Ed
Does your CSV list take into account ways tagged with ODbL=clean? If
not (and assuming the rebuild process will honour such tagging) would
it be possible for such objects to be excluded from your list?
Thanks,
Robert.
Good spot.
No my list didn't allow for odbl=clean. However, the
MarkS OSM@... writes:
Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
I've done an update and put some info on a wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MarkS/Remapping
I'll update these on an ad-hoc basis until the licence change has occurred.
MarkS wrote:
The page has the latest counts (down to 1889 currently expected to
be deleted).
And now 1733 by Simon's latest tally. :)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Licence-change-one-month-to-go-tp5531132p5549953.html
Sent from the Great
Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
I've done an update and put some info on a wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MarkS/Remapping
The page has the latest counts (down to 1889 currently expected to be
deleted). It also has a link to a CSV
On 4 March 2012 12:42, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Simon has very kindly provided this:
http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt
Excellent -- thanks to both of you for getting this done. Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
MarkS
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Excellent -- thanks to both of you for getting this done.
The credit belongs to Simon, not me! I believe that he is willing to
regenerate the list on occasion, but will wait to be contradicted if that's
not the case.
I think the trunk roads are doable too if
On 6 March 2012 15:48, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
(But I've not looked at really densely-mapped areas such as London, and the
situation may be more serious there.)
There are lots of patches of detail in London that are still at risk:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:48:50AM -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I'd like to think we'll be most of the way there with the primary and
secondary roads, too.
There are a few fairly important road/lanes in Cornwall that will be
lost the last time I looked. I expect to be in the area soon, so
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Tom Chance wrote:
On 6 March 2012 15:48, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
(But I've not looked at really densely-mapped areas such as London, and the
situation may be more serious there.)
There are lots of patches of detail in London that are still at
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
I think the trunk roads are doable too if enough people help out.
I am going to work my way through the A7* A8* and A9* roads in
Scotland, as I know most of them, and can fill in the blanks with
OSSV, bing or uploaded GPS traces.
I'm assuming that if the end nodes
There are lots of patches of detail in London that are still at risk:
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=13lat=51.51807lon=-0.1225layers=00B%0D%0A
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=13lat=51.51807lon=-0.1225layers=00B%0D%0A
My worry in Central London is the large number of traffic lights that
On 06/03/2012 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Excellent -- thanks to both of you for getting this done. Do you know
if/when that file will be updated as ways are re-mapped?
I was playing around tonight with a combination of the Quick History
Service and Overpass to requery the
MarkS wrote:
As Robert says getting a list of problem highway nodes/ways would
be a good step.
Simon has very kindly provided this:
http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
The other day I wrote:
But there are a few significant problem areas:
- Hertfordshire (Luton, Hemel etc.)
I'm delighted to report that the two major undecided mappers in
Hertfordshire have both just agreed. Thank you both.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Further to this, one helpful thing is if everyone makes sure they've
uploaded all their traces to OSM. I know I'm guilty of working from the
trace files locally when mapping, then forgetting to upload them so
other mappers can make use of the data.
That way we're not entirely reliant on OS data
On 2 March 2012 14:35, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a good
time to look at the current state of the UK.
We're almost certainly not going to be able to able to get the UK
completely clean by the switch-over, and
I agree that we want to try and have a complete main road network network.
Whilst longish stretches of road are easy to spot there are a lot of
other small sections (eg. bridges) which are harder to see on cleanmap
(unless the rest of the area is clean).
We also have the issue of nodes going
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
I wonder if another prioritisation approach might be useful
too -- prioritising certain high-value types of objects,
where-ever they might be.
Yes, I think that's an excellent idea. Obviously, everyone has their own
definition of high value (I'm quite anxious to
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a
good time to look at the current state of the UK. What's likely not to
be carried through to the new database?
The good news is that the UK is in a very healthy state overall. Just
under 99% of nodes will survive (98.68%
On 2 March 2012 14:35, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a good
time to look at the current state of the UK. What's likely not to be carried
through to the new database?
The good news is that the UK is in a very
On 02/03/12 14:35, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
If you have some free time over the next few weeks, do go and remap.
P2 and JOSM both have licence status displays. Bing and OS StreetView
are immensely useful resources (my P2 prefs have them assigned to
function keys F1 and F2 for easy reference).
Matt Williams lists@... writes:
I'm mainly focusing on
the road network first since I feel that's something that we don't
want to suddenly be broken on the 1st of April and is most easily
verifiable from Bing/OS.
Overall I think that Coventry will come out of this in better shape as
I'm
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:35 +, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
We change to the new licence in just under a month's time, so it's a
good time to look at the current state of the UK. What's likely not to
be carried through to the new database?
The good news is that the UK is in a very healthy
26 matches
Mail list logo
