Millennium Greens cover a wide range of on the ground usages. Same
are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not
retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid
overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than
to reuse and existing
Looking at the page on boundary=protected_area, perhaps class 7 is
the right one for Millennium Greens?
From
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Bac
kground
There are no protected areas for the United Kingdom in the WDPA
So I'd say probably not
Ed
There is the boundary=reserve proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reserve#Examples
But can you really call Millennium Greens, Doorstep Greens and CROW Open
Access Areas reserves? Not so sure. Having said that I do like the idea
of a boundary=something,
are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not
retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid
overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than
to reuse and existing key.
About the only thing these area have in common is that
On 4 July 2012 15:19, rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not intending to twist an existing tag (some of which are highly debated
anyway - e.g. landuse and landcover), just trying to identify which if any
are of use for these cases. Okay which is preferred out of:
* designation =
What problem? None really. Just trying to add some details to this aspect
of OSM. Although the funding is provided by the lottery the land has a
designation within central government. The fact that the land is designated
a millennium green means that certain conditions exist. Quoting from
6 matches
Mail list logo
