Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded

2009-11-16 Thread Thomas Wood
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:33 +, Thomas Wood wrote: Hi list, Just to inform you that 6 more counties have been uploaded this morning, Angus, East Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Highland, Leicestershire and Norfolk. The remaining 4 requested (and any others requested over the weekend) on the

[Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded

2009-11-13 Thread Thomas Wood
Hi list, Just to inform you that 6 more counties have been uploaded this morning, Angus, East Yorkshire, Herefordshire, Highland, Leicestershire and Norfolk. The remaining 4 requested (and any others requested over the weekend) on the wiki will be uploaded on Monday.

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Wood
Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred by not being able to get online. Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit), Torbay and Thurrock. W.Yorks caused me a lot of problems: 1) naptan:Notes was populated, often with strings greater than 255

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-15 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 15 Sep 2009, at 22:48, Thomas Wood wrote: ref/local_ref has been argued here in the past, I can't remember the reason for settling on the latter, I personally prefer the former. ref should be a national reference whilst local_ref is a reference on a more local basis, in this case usually

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-10 Thread Mark Williams
Peter Miller wrote: On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote: Thomas wrote: I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining NaPTAN counties that have been requested. I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list alphabetically,

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-10 Thread Peter Miller
On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote: Peter Miller wrote: On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote: Thomas wrote: I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining NaPTAN counties that have been requested. I'll probably do two or three at a time,

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-10 Thread Mark Williams
Peter Miller wrote: On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote: [] When I voted for Essex I had hoped that all of Essex might turn up, but as far as I can see it's excluded Thurrock, a little unitary authority in the S.W. corner - which is, naturally, the bit I wanted... To be

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-07 Thread Peter Miller
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote: Thomas wrote: I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining NaPTAN counties that have been requested. I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-06 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/9/6 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net: Hello Thomas, I am the right one for Cheshire East! I was out today and I thought I'd take a photo of one bus stop to see how the reference numbers on the bus stop compare with the import data. This info will be useful to put on

Re: [Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-06 Thread Frankie Roberto
Thomas wrote: I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining NaPTAN counties that have been requested. I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties next to each other together. Tonight I've

[Talk-GB] More NaPTAN Counties Uploaded - Bristol and Cheshire East

2009-09-05 Thread Thomas Wood
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining NaPTAN counties that have been requested. I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties next to each other together. Tonight I've uploaded Bristol and