Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-12 Thread Sam Vekemans
Ok cool, so i can pretend that 'route=recreation' exists and that it renders at the same zoom level as NCN and that is purpose is to map signed recreation routes that are NOT road cycling designated. And specicially for nationally confusing trails, such as the 'Trans Canada Trail'. I'll work on

[Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Seventy 7
I agree and I raised exactly the same question here http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=4141 I changed one of the loops to see if it would work but it was promptly changed back again. However, I still think that route=ncn is right. Perhaps we should vote? Steve

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Fairhurst
David Dixon wrote: Apart from standardising the tagging, this would also add the Byway to opencyclemap. In the absence of dissent, I'll update as suggested so shout now if you disagree! As someone who's mapped lots of both the National Byway and the NCN - disagree very very strongly. The

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Fairhurst
On 08/05/2010 12:08, Sam Vekemans wrote: +101 for rendering it brown, so its different than NCN, RCN, LCN I can use it promote it for the 'Trans Canada Trail' as a 'exact definition' as a leasure route with 'cycling being 1 activity, but not designated for that 1 activity' mountain biking /

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Sam Vekemans
Ok, so route=leisure; bicycle=designated rendering of brown at the same zoomlevels of NCN, would work awesome for the OCM fill the gaps :-) I can add 'network=nsn' for National Smooth/(sport) Network. Maybe? So my own rendering would pick it up for the dogsledding/canoes / rolerbladers that can

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Andy Allan
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: On 08/05/2010 12:08, Sam Vekemans wrote: +101 for rendering it brown, so its different than NCN, RCN, LCN I can use it  promote it for the 'Trans Canada Trail' as a 'exact definition' as a leasure route with

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread David Dixon
On 08/05/2010 11:31, Richard Fairhurst wrote: David Dixon wrote: Apart from standardising the tagging, this would also add the Byway to opencyclemap. In the absence of dissent, I'll update as suggested so shout now if you disagree! As someone who's mapped lots of both the National Byway and

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Fairhurst
On 08/05/2010 13:43, Andy Allan wrote: On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net wrote: Really, the National Byway is a fourth category: a leisure/touring route. There are lots of these in OSM at the moment, but generally tagged as LCN (for example, the Four

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-08 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Richard Fairhurst wrote: Sent: 08 May 2010 12:20 PM To: OSM - Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route On 08/05/2010 12:08, Sam Vekemans wrote: +101 for rendering it brown, so its different than NCN, RCN, LCN I can use it promote it for the 'Trans Canada Trail' as a 'exact

[Talk-GB] National Byway cycle route

2010-05-07 Thread David Dixon
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Byway Currently the National Byway cycle route (and the additional loops) are tagged as network=National Byway while all other cycle routes are =ncn, rcn or lcn. Are there any good reasons why the Byway shouldn't be: name=National Byway