Re: [Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

2017-01-02 Thread Dave F
Could you expand & clarify please? What is an OSM candidate? For Tendring, are you saying there's more entities in OSM with an FHRS tag than there are in the FHRS government data? Why are the results arbitrary? Cheers DaveF On 31/12/2016 10:39, Andrew Hain wrote: As an exercise in measuring

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

2017-01-01 Thread Gregrs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 My apologies Andrew, I somehow managed to send a blank email from your address as a result of typing something into the wrong window and inadvertently triggering a key command! Sorry for the unnecessary noise... Happy New Year! Greg - -- Twitte

[Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

2017-01-01 Thread Andrew Hain
___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

2016-12-31 Thread Andrew Hain
As an exercise in measuring OSM’s coverage I have crunched the numbers in GregRS’s CSV output to calculate the number of OSM candidates in each district as a proportion of the number of FHRS entries that the program reports. The figures are a bit arbitrary and values over 100% are not necessaril