On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 15:20, nathan case wrote:
> The two main components of the green, a wood and a grass area, are separately
> mapped as such.
>
> Where would you add the designation tag? To the boundary or to the two main
> landuse components? Or would you create a relation so that the
expect considering this is the approach used for, e.g., nature reserves).
I think this is because protect_class=21 just doesn't get rendered.
-Original Message-
From: Russ Garrett
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 2:35 PM
To: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
Cc: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Town Greens
In the past the term urban commons was widely used in the ecological
literature for all sorts of (mainly) grassy spaces in towns. If one wanted
a catch-all designation this might be suitable, although I think it would
be perhaps better used to replace the usages of landuse=grass &
leisure=common
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
wrote:
> What I would do with these is to separate the legal status from the
> physical and usage characteristics. First I would tag the legal
> status, using the designation=* tag (which was set up for such
> purposes) i.e.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 11:49, nathan case wrote:
> I made a recent edit to a local area that has recently been designated a
> “Town Green”.
>
> Edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82973329
What I would do with these is to separate the legal status from the
physical and usage
ance from the land owner.
It seemed like this was something I should update and record in OSM.
Unfortunately it's now no longer rendering.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 1:53 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Town Greens
On 03/0
On 03/04/2020 13:40, nathan case wrote:
I ruled it out because, from the same wiki:
"This tag is intended for (usually urban) parks with managed greenery" and "parks
not so designed and manicured, but rather left in a more wild and natural state should not get this
tag, instead, use another
l_park"
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:31 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Town Greens
What is wrong with Park?
From the wiki: "A park is an area of open space for recreational use, usually
designed
Smale
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 12:03 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Town Greens
Considering that it is legally and functionally the same as a Village Green, I
would say use the same tag i.e. landuse=village_green. It may be *called* a
town green because it belongs
What is wrong with Park?
From the wiki: "A park is an area of open space for recreational use,
usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and
bushes. Parks are usually urban"
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Considering that it is legally and functionally the same as a Village
Green, I would say use the same tag i.e. landuse=village_green. It may
be *called* a town green because it belongs to a settlement that is a
town (who decides that is a whole other discussion) and/or has a Town
Council (which
Hi all,
I made a recent edit to a local area that has recently been designated a "Town
Green".
Edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82973329
News:
https://www.lancasterguardian.co.uk/news/lancasters-freemans-wood-looks-set-become-town-green-after-eight-year-battle-1357617
For those
12 matches
Mail list logo
