One thing that I'd definitely do (and you may be doing already) would be
to record details from the actual sign in a note tag. That's not going
to help routers, but it will help future mappers and aid retagging when
at some point in the future we've reached a concensus about how best to
map
[I'm a bit confused about replying to the group, hope this goes to the
right destination]
Belated thanks for the various comments, I've been away.
Of the various views, I tend to like highway=service +
designation=unclassified_highway as the most useful. There are a lot of
these signs in the
Hi,
This probably won't help the eventual tagging, but the 'unfit for 'wide
/ long vehicles' bit is to do with legislation, both UK nowadays
European. I think the relevant bit is the 'Construction Use
Regulations' which lays down the maximum sizes for normal road usage. If
the vehicle
There are lots of roads where I map which have Unfit for motors signs
(blue/white advisory) but are normal maintained roads in limited but
regular use. Typically they are narrowish, with lots of bends and often
steep. In general anything up to maybe the size of a skip lorry can get
through (though
motor_vehicl http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehiclee=no
should suffice I would have thought?
On 10 December 2012 13:36, cotswolds mapper osmcotswo...@gmail.com wrote:
There are lots of roads where I map which have Unfit for motors signs
(blue/white advisory) but are normal
from the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
motor_vehicl http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehiclee=no
Access permission for any motorized vehicle
these routes do have access permission, but are signed as unsuitable/unfit
which is more advisory
Best Wishes
Peter
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 December 2012 14:30
To: cotswolds mapper
Cc: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Unfit for motors - tagging for routing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle motor_vehicle=no
should suffice I would have thought?
On 10 December 2012 13:36, cotswolds mapper
On 10 December 2012 15:11, Gregory Williams
greg...@gregorywilliams.me.uk wrote:
I think that changing the class of the road to service isn’t the best way of
recording the data. These roads will quite often legally be an unclassified
highway and changing the class away from that just isn’t
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
Instead I've used highway=track based on the physical
appearance, and then added designation=
unclassified_highway to record the legal classification.
Agreed: I often do something similar.
In this case, though, I'm not entirely comfortable with highway=service
9 matches
Mail list logo
