On 8 May 2013 16:09, Jason Woollacott wool...@hotmail.com wrote:
And then we end up with disputes over what areas you are and are not
permitted to enter. Broken Lines, and you are permitted to enter if
safe, solid lines, only permitted to enter in an emergency. Both of
which
On 09/05/2013 12:56, Jason Cunningham wrote:
UK legislation is fairly clear that Traffic Islands (with or without
hatched markings before are after) are not considered to create two
carriagways. We're not mapping legislation, but nethertheless I wouldnt
create two carriageways for a traffic
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
and this:
http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye )
I like these (although the first one
I did something similar to this junction:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSYTukM-- / http://binged.it/16jtNsx (note that the
most detailed aerial photo is quite old and predates the guided busway -
zoom out for more recent imagery)
primarily to get routing right. The current version reflects some
On 09/05/2013 13:30, Oliver Jowett wrote:
If there's a better way to represent this while keeping enough
information to be able to route sensibly, how should it be done?
You can set up turn restrictions with relations where necessary. But as
John said, it doesn't do much for pedestrians (or
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 09/05/2013 13:30, Oliver Jowett wrote:
If there's a better way to represent this while keeping enough
information to be able to route sensibly, how should it be done?
You can set up turn restrictions with
First of all - thanks for all the replies. I've added a link to this
thread to the map note.
David Earl wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
It's a couple of months since I was there, but my recollection is that
that one
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
First of all - thanks for all the replies. I've added a link to this
thread to the map note.
David Earl wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
On 9 May 2013 13:06, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
and this:
http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye )
These look good to me. I have mapped a number of
Well if a road is separated into lanes by a large area of paint which has
a legal injunction not to enter, can that be regarded as barrier=paint? It
passes the test of being physical - visible paint has been applied to the
road and it passes the test of being a barrier by law.
Regards
Brian
so. And lets
not even discuss yellow box junctions...
Jason. (UniEagle)
F rom: Brian Prangle
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Tom Chance
Cc: talk-gb OSM List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple
ways when road is not divided
Well
I recently added this note in Lincoln:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/1565
There are a number of problems here. The A15 here isn't a dual
carriageway, and the roads between the southbound A15 and Pottergate
consequentially don't exist. There may well be turn restrictions into
and
I have always operated on the assumption that you only split the road into
two ways if they are physically separated by a barrier, I'm pretty sure
that has been the consensus practice for a good six years.
Regards,
Tom
On 7 May 2013 12:27, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
I
+1 from me.
Jason (UniEagle)
From: Tom Chance
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:05 PM
To: SomeoneElse
Cc: talk-gb OSM List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple
ways when road is not divided
I have always operated on the assumption that you only split
+1 from me too.
Phil (trigpoint)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Like others I agree that split roads must have some absolute barrier
between them. If there is a traffic jam and it is possible to do a U-turn
then the road should not be split.
There are however a number of cases which might be a bit harder to call. I
notice a revised road layout yesterday where
16 matches
Mail list logo
