I keep hearing snagging issues that *might* be resolved by a more federal
OSM, in the map presentation as well as in the organisational structure.
Is that something that's ever been considered?
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 13:40, Nick wrote:
> Totally agree that openstreetmap.org isn't supposed to be
Totally agree that openstreetmap.org isn't supposed to be a "general
public" map destination but without knowing user journeys, I assume that
is where most people land.
Options could be that openstreetmap.org provide alternative links based
on locality and/or develop robust (N.B. tiles from op
On 13/12/2020 11:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
Note that someone who wants to show their map style at OSM website can
be included, though they must sponsor hosting
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tile_layers/Guidelines_for_new_tile_layers
As far as I know, the mai
3 matches
Mail list logo
