My thoughts also.
The description tag is very underused , IMHO. Specialist tags are
undoubtedly extremely useful, they are precise, (should be) unambiguous
and machine-read-friendly, but they do need to gain traction to be
useful and are unfriendly when trying to convey fuzzy information, as
Rather than enter text into a value where a number is expected .. why
not use the description tag?
Description=For supervised younger children.
Description=For unsupervised older children.
??
On 05/06/19 03:51, SK53 wrote:
It might be germane to this discussion to consider minheight &
It might be germane to this discussion to consider minheight & maxheight as
possible values. Certainly in ski resorts it is not uncommon to see minimum
heights for certain chair lifts (typically 1.25m) and I think I've seen
similar on amusement park rides. Height is more likely to be a determining
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:49 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > What about `max_age=toddler`? (i.e. the oldest you can be is "a
> > toddler"), likewise `min_age=young_child` for the "older" one? (Is
> > that
> > the best term?) Yes it's not a numeric age, but it's better than
> > nothing?
>
> Thanks
What about `max_age=toddler`? (i.e. the oldest you can be is "a
toddler"), likewise `min_age=young_child` for the "older" one? (Is that
the best term?) Yes it's not a numeric age, but it's better than nothing?
Thanks Rory.
I wondered about that. If a tag expects a numeric value, is it ok to
On 04/06/2019 16:21, Martin Wynne wrote:
In the local park there are two areas of play equipment for children.
One is fenced off and clearly intended for infants/toddlers accompanied
by parents.
Next to it there is a larger unfenced area containing play equipment for
unsupervised older
6 matches
Mail list logo
