Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-20 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:13:48 + Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Andy, Both those links are the same, and both seem to point (for me anyway) to the original except buses junction. It's not just you, Andy. I got the same result and thought it must be me. -- Regards _

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-20 Thread David Earl
On 20/03/2013 09:25, Brad Rogers wrote: Both those links are the same, and both seem to point (for me anyway) to the original except buses junction. It's not just you, Andy. I got the same result and thought it must be me. Sigh. I corrected them immediately afterwards.

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-20 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:31:26 + David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote: Hello David, Sigh. I corrected them immediately afterwards. They've not arrived here yet, nor do they appear in the list archive. It's not a big deal, just pointing out to Andy he wasn't alone. -- Regards _

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread David Fisher
[mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote: On 31 October 2012 14:37, David Fisher djfishe

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread Richard Mann
October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote: On 31 October 2012 14:37, David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The pedestrianised main

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread David Earl
On 19/03/2013 14:04, David Fisher wrote: Hi Shaun, I take it you're referring to Ipswich? In which case, I can sort of see the logic. It's not one-way, it's no entry, so when the excepting conditions are satisfied it becomes two-way. In Croydon's case there's that no motor vehicles sign at

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread Philip Barnes
Shrewsbury has a no entry except vehicles over 13' 3 high ( and cycles ). There is no one way of any sort at the other end, so I assume providing you don't pass the no entry sign you can turn back at any point. It also has a street with no vehicles except for access (red circle, so includes

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread Simon Blake
Could I ask the panel about http://goo.gl/maps/y9Zj3 ? If you look towards the road to the right (Parliament St, Gloucester), there are No Entry signs with no exceptions signed, but on the road it says Buses and taxis only. Equally, the sign under the green filter arrow on the right-hand traffic

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread David Earl
On 19/03/2013 20:10, Simon Blake wrote: Could I ask the panel about http://goo.gl/maps/y9Zj3 ? If you look towards the road to the right (Parliament St, Gloucester), there are No Entry signs with no exceptions signed, but on the road it says Buses and taxis only. Equally, the sign under the

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-19 Thread David Earl
On 19/03/2013 20:34, David Earl wrote: On 19/03/2013 20:10, Simon Blake wrote: Could I ask the panel about http://goo.gl/maps/y9Zj3 ? If you look towards the road to the right (Parliament St, Gloucester), there are No Entry signs with no exceptions signed, but on the road it says Buses and

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2013-03-01 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 31 Oct 2012, at 16:02, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote: On 31/10/2012 15:29, Andy Robinson wrote: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread Matt Williams
On 31 October 2012 14:37, David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The pedestrianised main shopping street in Croydon has a sign with the following wording: Pedestrian Zone. No vehicles except cycles and for loading 6pm-10am. How would you interpret that? I see at least 3

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote: On 31 October 2012 14:37, David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The pedestrianised main shopping street in Croydon has a sign with the following wording: Pedestrian Zone. No vehicles except cycles and for

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread Andy Robinson
Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote: On 31 October 2012 14:37, David

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread Andy Robinson
restrictions sign Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote: On 31 October 2012

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 31 Oct 2012, at 15:29, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt

Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign

2012-10-31 Thread David Earl
On 31/10/2012 15:29, Andy Robinson wrote: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk] wrote: Sent: 31 October 2012 15:21 To: Matt Williams Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Ambiguous restrictions sign On 31 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote