Re: [Talk-GB] Miniature railway or minimum gauge?

2019-05-21 Thread Martin Wynne
On 21/05/2019 12:18, Mark Goodge wrote: > ... From a mapping perspective, therefore, there are two questions which need to be asked: 1. Was the railway originally constructed purely for leisure purposes? 2. Are the locomotives intended to be models or replicas of full-size locomotives (or

Re: [Talk-GB] Miniature railway or minimum gauge?

2019-05-21 Thread Mark Goodge
On 20/05/2019 22:13, jc...@mail.com wrote: On 18/05/2019 18:03, Mark Goodge wrote: The OSM wiki is correct to distinguish between miniature railways (ie, ridable models) and small gauge "real" railways, as this reflects usage among railway engineers and enthusiasts in the non-mapping

Re: [Talk-GB] Miniature railway or minimum gauge?

2019-05-20 Thread jc...@mail.com
On 18/05/2019 18:03, Mark Goodge wrote: > Other 15" railways in the UK (eg, the Evesham Vale Light Railway) are > mostly tagged as railway=narrow_gauge. How do you come to this conclusion? Using the list of 15" railways on Wikipedia, (including the retagged Rhiw Valley) on OSM in the UK are

Re: [Talk-GB] Miniature railway or minimum gauge?

2019-05-19 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
18 May 2019, 19:03 by m...@good-stuff.co.uk: > I think the wiki age for Tag:railway=miniature needs updating to remove the > spurious distinct between minimum and narrow gauge, and make it consistent > with the usage defined on the main page for Key:railway itself. > railway=miniature page

Re: [Talk-GB] Miniature railway or minimum gauge?

2019-05-18 Thread Mark Goodge
On 18/05/2019 16:35, Martin Wynne wrote: Wikipedia suggests that a "miniature railway" is one using rideable *models* of real railways, which is not the case for the RVLR:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum-gauge_railway Should I change the tag to railway=minimum_gauge, bearing in