I've noticed a stack of stations showing up on the map recently labelled
VillageName Station which just seams wrong and to have them show up on
the default rendering seams even more wrong.
They are tagged railway=station; disused=yes
e.g.
Widmerpool Station http://osm.org/go/eu8kWOCCe--
Plumtree
On 6 July 2012 21:43, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
I've noticed a stack of stations showing up on the map recently labelled
VillageName Station which just seams wrong and to have them show up on the
default rendering seams even more wrong.
They are tagged railway=station;
Done - I now remember where I first saw them jumping out at me!
On 6 July 2012 21:49, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2012 21:43, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
I've noticed a stack of stations showing up on the map recently labelled
VillageName Station which just
However, there are also instances of highway=no, where roads have been
realigned or ripped up, should these also be removed from the database?
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
remote mappers from adding something from a source that is not up to
date. In
On 4 July 2012 09:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
However, there are also instances of highway=no, where roads have been
realigned or ripped up, should these also be removed from the database?
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
On 4 July 2012 09:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
remote mappers from adding something from a source that is not up to
date.
… However, what
is the argument for keeping connections between
) but this is not a historic
document.
Cheers
Jason W (UniEagle)
-Original Message-
From: Dave F.
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 10:49 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] railway:historic = rail tags
On 30/06/2012 15:11, SomeoneElse wrote:
Obviously mapping
On 1 July 2012 22:49, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 30/06/2012 15:11, SomeoneElse wrote:
Obviously mapping things that aren't there any more is a bigger
issue
Has there been discussion about this outside talk:railway? If there hasn't
I'm a bit annoyed that a niche user
Peter Miller wrote:
I started using railway:historic=xxx in place of railway=dismantled
for cycletracks etc in response to a comment through OSM
messaging that one editor had found it confusing to suddenly
have cyclepaths being rendered as railways in Potlatch due the
railway=xxx tag
On 2 Jul 2012, at 16:19, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
I started using railway:historic=xxx in place of railway=dismantled
for cycletracks etc in response to a comment through OSM
messaging that one editor had found it confusing to suddenly
have cyclepaths being rendered
I had spotted some of these, same mapper, near Whitchurch, and must
admit it has concerned me as previously it had shown on the map as a
tracked.
It is still visible on the ground, but now not visible on the map. This
seems wrong to me, my feeling it should be reverted. Was going to
contract the
11 matches
Mail list logo
