Hi,
I set about correcting a few dozen post code entries in NPE for south east
London, but the postcodes map doesn't seem to be updating:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/postcodes/?zoom=13lat=51.48557lon=-0.07888layers=B00T0F0F
Have the hopefully weekly updates stopped? Any plans to
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hello Godfrey,
Sorry I should have made another point:
If it's a path which you know is a right of way via an Ordnance Survey
map, but cannot verify that on the ground, again you must use
foot=permissive even if that's not true. This is because you can't verify
the
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Tom Chancet...@acrewoods.net wrote:
Hi,
I set about correcting a few dozen post code entries in NPE for south east
London, but the postcodes map doesn't seem to be updating:
Hi,
Seen this map before, very cool. Do you use the postcode=* or
add:postcode=* to pull out the areas?
Ciarán
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 17/08/2009 13:28, Glenn Proctor wrote:
Following on from this, am I correct in assuming that the only
definitive source of mapping information about public rights of way is
the OS? It seems ludicrous that *public* rights of way are effectively
copyrighted in this manner. I suppose it's
but
one can then do that on the ground.
Any many people are already mapping the footpaths (etc) on the
ground. Each weekend my wife and I try and find time to go for a
walk somewhere nearby which adds at least one public footpath to OSM
based on GPX trace. And if people do add paths using NPE
Glenn Proctor wrote:
Following on from this, am I correct in assuming that the only
definitive source of mapping information about public rights of way is
the OS? It seems ludicrous that *public* rights of way are effectively
copyrighted in this manner. I suppose it's analagous to the issue
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:53:52 +0100, Dave Stubbs wrote:
Currently got an issue compiling mapnik on my dev box that generates
them.. some conflict with latest ubuntu... probably easy to fix just
haven't got round to it.
I do /plan/ to fix it... I just don't know when it'll happen :-)
Aha,
Following on from this, am I correct in assuming that the only
definitive source of mapping information about public rights of way is
the OS? It seems ludicrous that *public* rights of way are effectively
copyrighted in this manner. I suppose it's analagous to the issue with
council boundaries.
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Someone probably needs to sort this out with a council. Maybe I'll get
round to doing it with mine at some stage.
I contacted my local council with a freedom of information request -
asking if I could obtain vector information of particular rights of way
from them. After
Hi everyone. I am fairly new to OSM, but have been blown away with how great
the project is.
I have managed to find the following site http://openmtbmap.org/ that gives
OSM maps a link to gps units and mountain bike routes in the UK.
I have managed to add some minor documentation on this
I have completed the following relations for Unitary Authority
Boundaries and put them in the Wales Wiki : Wrexham (137981), Flintshire
(198566) and Denbighshire (192442). Now some inevitable questions:
1. How should Flintshire and Denbighshire be completed out at sea? On
the Wales Wiki it
Tim wrote:
Anyone else out there using a Nokia 95 8GB to update
maps for OSM, and/or using the openmtb project? I am
ideally looking for a howto on how edit OSM and upload
routes using an N95 :)
I'm not, but a quick search for Nokia N95 on the OSM wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org
I have researched boundaries
of the English counties and unitary authorities. it seems that
generally they follow the mean low water mark. Some of the land
is owned by the council, some by private owners but often by the Crown
Estates and leased to the council. By using the low water mark the
14 matches
Mail list logo
