[Talk-GB] Remapping ways without nodes (was: Re: Remapping update)

On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy sources? While we're on this topic, could I urge all of those working on

Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping ways without nodes (was: Re: Remapping update)

While we're on this topic, could I urge all of those working on Andy Street's area to remap all constituent nodes of a way, rather than just the way itself, I've come across at least 3 users who have re-constructed ways but left Andy's nodes intact. I'd have thought that remapping the ways

Re: [Talk-GB] Un-relicensable roads - now with secondary roads included

And some. I ordered by type and randomly clicked on a dozen and haven't found one you haven't already squashed. I have better luck finding things using badmap. Sorry for a late reply; my hard drive started to fail on Wednesday and it has taken this long to get replacement bits and what was

Re: [Talk-GB] Un-relicensable roads - now with secondary roads included

A simplified version of the URL that would be useful in situations like the Ed's list [2] does not work or throw any error at all. [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=55.9567019lon=- 3.1310164way=32795934zoom=16 [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=32795934 Sorry, see