On 11/04/13 14:59, Dave F. wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 08:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>
>> No mention of OSM in this piece:
>>
>> http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22099960
>>
>
> A couple of quotes from Chris has now been added, however it still
> disappointing it reads like an advert & even an instruc
Thanks to Ed & John. I really like the white lines pitch markings.
Dave F.
On 11/04/2013 02:38, John Baker wrote:
The French OSM site has worldwide mapnik rendering of golf courses and
nifty sports pitches mapped too.
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=16&lat=48.72648&lon=2.60806&layers=B0
On 11 April 2013 14:53, Matt Williams wrote:
> In case people haven't noticed, the article has been updated with a quote
> from Chris about OSM.
>
Well done!
Tom
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
___
Talk-GB mailing list
T
On 11/04/2013 08:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
No mention of OSM in this piece:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22099960
A couple of quotes from Chris has now been added, however it still
disappointing it reads like an advert & even an instruction manual.
Dave F.
___
In case people haven't noticed, the article has been updated with a quote
from Chris about OSM.
Matt
On 11 April 2013 14:44, Grant Slater wrote:
> On 11 April 2013 14:14, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >
> > Great. I did approach him on Twitter; he's @LeoKelion, but hasn't
> replied.
> >
>
> And a few
On 11 April 2013 14:14, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> Great. I did approach him on Twitter; he's @LeoKelion, but hasn't replied.
>
And a few others :-)
https://twitter.com/firefishy1/status/322285311587655680
https://twitter.com/firefishy1/status/322286200058687488
https://twitter.com/smsm1/status/322
Great. I did approach him on Twitter; he's @LeoKelion, but hasn't replied.
On Apr 11, 2013 12:49 PM, "Chris Hill" wrote:
> I've just had an email from Leo, who wrote the piece and it seems he may
> add to it including a reference to the closed nature of OSM and
> acknowledging OSM. I also pointed
I've noticed this page has a description of the difference:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_map_maker
On 11 April 2013 12:51, Chris Hill wrote:
> Sorry, that should, of course, been the closed nature of Google data.
>
>
> On 11/04/13 12:49, Chris Hill wrote:
>
>> I've just had an emai
Sorry, that should, of course, been the closed nature of Google data.
On 11/04/13 12:49, Chris Hill wrote:
I've just had an email from Leo, who wrote the piece and it seems he
may add to it including a reference to the closed nature of OSM and
acknowledging OSM. I also pointed him to RichardF's
I've just had an email from Leo, who wrote the piece and it seems he may
add to it including a reference to the closed nature of OSM and
acknowledging OSM. I also pointed him to RichardF's tweet describing
crowd-serfing https://twitter.com/richardf/status/296244090415239168
--
Cheers, Chris
us
You can always call the BBC up and ask if they would like a quote to give
the piece balance. The Beeb love their balance, they get nervous if you
suggest a piece lacks balance.
So you'd suggest that the article includes a quote from critics who point
out that the data is only available to Google,
On 11 April 2013 08:12, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> No mention of OSM in this piece:
>
> http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22099960
>
>
Google has been getting a free pass from the media but now they are making
hardware that may change, waiting for the Nexus sweatshop / employee
suicide stories to eme
No mention of OSM in this piece:
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22099960
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
13 matches
Mail list logo
