As they are free to attend (watch the £30 potential no-show penalty though)
thought I would circulate as may be of interest to some:
http://www.geoinformationgroup.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/GeoDATA-2013
-Flyer.pdf
Cheers
Andy
___
Talk-GB
On 8 May 2013 16:09, Jason Woollacott wool...@hotmail.com wrote:
And then we end up with disputes over what areas you are and are not
permitted to enter. Broken Lines, and you are permitted to enter if
safe, solid lines, only permitted to enter in an emergency. Both of
which
On 09/05/2013 12:56, Jason Cunningham wrote:
UK legislation is fairly clear that Traffic Islands (with or without
hatched markings before are after) are not considered to create two
carriagways. We're not mapping legislation, but nethertheless I wouldnt
create two carriageways for a traffic
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
and this:
http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye )
I like these (although the first one
I did something similar to this junction:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSYTukM-- / http://binged.it/16jtNsx (note that the
most detailed aerial photo is quite old and predates the guided busway -
zoom out for more recent imagery)
primarily to get routing right. The current version reflects some
On 09/05/2013 13:30, Oliver Jowett wrote:
If there's a better way to represent this while keeping enough
information to be able to route sensibly, how should it be done?
You can set up turn restrictions with relations where necessary. But as
John said, it doesn't do much for pedestrians (or
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 09/05/2013 13:30, Oliver Jowett wrote:
If there's a better way to represent this while keeping enough
information to be able to route sensibly, how should it be done?
You can set up turn restrictions with
First of all - thanks for all the replies. I've added a link to this
thread to the map note.
David Earl wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
It's a couple of months since I was there, but my recollection is that
that one
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
First of all - thanks for all the replies. I've added a link to this
thread to the map note.
David Earl wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
On 9 May 2013 13:06, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
and this:
http://osm.org/go/eu6_VCkLp-- (aerial: http://binged.it/16js1Ye )
These look good to me. I have mapped a number of
10 matches
Mail list logo
