Tom Chance tom@... writes:
Here's another one, this editor really ought to be fixed or
removed:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17655245
I tried using the JOSM Revert plugin, but it just downloaded the nodes
without the way.
Tom
Were the landuse areas attached to roads?
--
On 10 Sep 2013, at 07:05, Andrew andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Tom Chance tom@... writes:
Here's another one, this editor really ought to be fixed or
removed:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17655245
I tried using the JOSM Revert plugin, but it just downloaded the nodes
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Were the landuse areas attached to roads?
It’s rather easy in iD to click the middle of an area and select the area.
It's the way it works ... if you click and there is nothing close, then it picks
up an area which may well be outside the area you are looking at ...
It
Lester wrote:
It would be MUCH safer if you had to pick the boundary to select
it!
But much harder to use for areas that share the boundary ways with
an adjacent area. You'd have to resort to the / stuff that Potlatch
uses or middle-click for JOSM (or whatever).
New mappers are likely to make
In my opinion you should always have to click the boundary. If not then it
is impossible to determine what you have selected. What if there are many
areas overlapping and you click inside the overlapped area? How could it
determine which of the areas you want to select?
On 10 September 2013
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:29:24 +0100, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
wrote:
One reason for this is parallax error, because the images aren't
taken square on to the ground (that may be because the camera is
taking in quite a large area. You can see this with building, you
can end up with a
I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering
stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and
start with a new bug list on github.
That is step 3 on the roadmap described on the openstreetmap-carto repo:
On 10 September 2013 12:00, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
I would hope that whoever might fix the bugs in the rendering
stylesheet would start with those rather than discard all of them and
start with a new bug list on github.
That is step 3 on the roadmap described on
On 10 September 2013 09:56, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
New mappers are likely to make mistakes whatever editing software
they use.
That's true. What I noticed with these landuse areas is:
(a) the beginnings of a pattern, suggesting a defect in the software
(b) that these changes are
Ed Loach wrote:
It would be MUCH safer if you had to pick the boundary to select
it!
But much harder to use for areas that share the boundary ways with
an adjacent area. You'd have to resort to the / stuff that Potlatch
uses or middle-click for JOSM (or whatever).
I think all I am asking for
On 10 September 2013 13:20, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
That's true. What I noticed with these landuse areas is:
(a) the beginnings of a pattern, suggesting a defect in the software
I gave iD a try recently, and went back to using Potlatch pretty
quickly afterwards. One of the main
11 matches
Mail list logo
