On 28 September 2013 21:24, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
Corner coordinates are now displaying, allowing these to be aligned
adjusted to fit. Have fun!
Would it e possible for someone to stitch all these into one layer for
ooc.openstreetmap.org ?
--
Andy Mabbett
Hi Andy,
There is a whole bunch of OS Town Plans available on the National Library
of Scotland website. They are already georectified and served up as tiles
(ready for use in OSM editors). I am in the early stages of getting these
added to iD and JOSM as a series of separate layers.
I note that
I've just noticed (changeset 18037116) someone using this Land
Registry data search tool to actually populate, rather than simply
flag for re-survey postcode data. Given that the Land Registry
require a copyright notice, and, unlike OS Open Data, there is no such
copyright notice on OSM, is this
== Quote ==
I've just noticed (changeset 18037116) someone using this Land
Registry data search tool to actually populate, rather than simply
flag for re-survey postcode data. Given that the Land Registry
require a copyright notice, and, unlike OS Open Data, there is no such
copyright notice on
Oh I should add that I am a fan of source tags on the objects myself so I
add a source:postcode=Land Registry 'Price Paid' data tag (or =ONS
Postcode Centroids) to my edits. Not everyone agrees that source tags
should be added to the objects, preferring instead to add them to the
changeset
On 26 September 2013 12:39, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
Each one has been georeferenced by the BL, and the coordinates for a
bounding box and for the exact corner points are available; it's
currently not displaying, but I'll be configuring this tonight.
Corner coordinates are
Looks like some very good work is going on in Ruislip!
When I saw the initial comment I also expected the changeset to be mine
as it's the sort of thing I've been doing as well. Although I try to add
a source code to everything I add to the data, I'm pretty sure there are
times when I miss
On 28 September 2013 20:45, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
== Quote ==
I've just noticed (changeset 18037116) someone using this Land
Registry data search tool to actually populate, rather than simply
flag for re-survey postcode data. Given that the Land Registry
require a
Peter,
After your first post on this, my initial thought was that you were
correct and the simpler tag you were proposing was enough. I started
following your proposal, but I've thought a little more feel that the
more involved 'GB:nsl_single' type tag is actually needed I'll be
going back
On 28 September 2013 23:50, Nick Allen nick.allen...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, if you're looking for a project in OSM, adding addresses is easily
accomplished. Personally I currently use Keypad-Mapper 3 OSMTracker to do
my surveying, and the exercise does me the world of good.
If anyone
On 28 September 2013 20:52, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh I should add that I am a fan of source tags on the objects myself so I
add a source:postcode=Land Registry 'Price Paid' data tag (or =ONS
Postcode Centroids) to my edits. Not everyone agrees that source tags should
HADW,
I can see where your concerns stem from, agree that some form of
suitable source code to indicate where the data is derived from could
mitigate any potential problems. At present there are some mappers,
myself included, who are obtaining postcodes derived from the 'Land
Registry price
12 matches
Mail list logo