Dragging this back up...
On Thursday 10 October 2013, cquest wrote:
> ...
It's still possible to see my slightly aborted attempt at adding ONS codes to
relations a few years ago - this was made more difficult by the ONS deciding to
change their coding scheme (to something equally incomprehensib
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's
> much simpler and reflects what's on the ground
Apologies: I rejected your suggestion too quickly.
If instead of maxweight, I use maxweight:forward = 7.5 on a
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:57:24AM +0100, Nick Allen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Before you map it I would check around a little as this situation is very
> unusual. Weight restrictions are only used to protect something such as a
> culvert, bridge, or other underground vulnerable object. If the
> authorit
On 14 October 2013 13:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The note is great for humans, but won't be able to be interpreted by
> routing algorithms. Using the "Conditional Restrictions" from
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions , I'd
On 12/10/2013 21:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
there is are industrial units, and a
On 12 October 2013 21:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
> I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
> and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
> would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
> there is are industrial
6 matches
Mail list logo
