Re: [Talk-GB] Adjacent nature reserves
On 09/06/19 23:58, Martin Wynne wrote: we now have 2 natural=heaths named as nature reserves and with operator tags but without nature reserve tags. Hi Adam, But they are now nested within a larger area which does have a nature reserve tag. Much of the publicity material for this area treats it as a single nature reserve. But the nature reserveS have different names and ownership and should be tagged as such. The heath is the common aspect between the two yet this is where the names and ownership are applied? This is clearly tagging for the render. And it fails https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=52.3600=-2.2836 Results in the wood and the combined nature reserve ... but no idea of which nature reserve applies here. The two nature reserves should be separate entries as nature reserves - which is what they are. Truth in tagging should be applied. --- Quibble There is also the aspect that the heath has a wood in it .. yet the heath covers the wood. The heath should be a multipolygon relation with an inner for the wood ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #463 2019-05-28-2019-06-03
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 463, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12163/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login with your OSM account. Read more about how to write a post here: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/this-news-should-be-in-weeklyosm weeklyOSM? who: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
