Looks like the fixme was added to the end node of that road when it was
first created, and then the person who added the loop probably didn't
realise it was there so it remained.
If you look at the node history and the changeset where it was created,
you can see the loop being added and the
Hi Peter,
These very much look like fixmes which got forgotten. They do not show up
directly in many editors (and only recently in iD). In this case all the
ones you mention look to have been fully resolved by the existing mapping.
In that case it's safe just to remove the fixmes, which is good
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:12:24PM +0100, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
> Trades will occasionally have small items delivered, especially if
> specialized or in an emergency. A foreman I know had his kid's Christmas
> present sent to site to keep the surprise.
>
> Please provide an OSM link to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:20:31PM +0100, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 11:21, ael wrote:
> > In the case that I mentioned, it was certainly not from their own GPS
> > logs.
>
> A few examples I came across while looking at these with a DWG hat on were
> also not from GPS logs. In one
If this is not the correct place / route to seek assistance with this issue,
please advise me where to go.
I see that, on a new housing estate near me, there are a number of "Fix Me"
tags on highway=residential, which I would like to fix.
The tags all say, "noexit? turning_circle? stub?"
Thanks Andy, that provides some useful context. As others have also pointed out
new data is generally good for OSM and we can't expect all users to ever get
all the tags right on a first pass. I'll be keeping a closer eye in my area and
will make direct contact with mappers who seem to be
On 29/07/2019 11:21, ael wrote:
In the case that I mentioned, it was certainly not from their own GPS
logs.
A few examples I came across while looking at these with a DWG hat on
were also not from GPS logs. In one case Amazon would have had to have
been delivering by tractor; in another the
On 29/07/2019 09:35, Andy Robinson wrote:
I've just looked at a number of Amazon Logistics in my local area
Just to give everyone a bit of a heads-up about the DWG's involvement
here - we got a number of messages about Amazon's mapping. The biggest
immediate problem was their use of
Last night I updated my solar mapping comparison tool to include coverage of
Scotland. Unfortunately it had only covered England and Wales up until now
because my comparison with the FiT register data was performed at the LSOA
level. For Scotland, the comparison is being performed just at the
9 matches
Mail list logo
