Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread ael
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:25:24AM +, Devonshire wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote: > > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote: > > The inability to mark an object's location as "authorititive" has always > seemed like a massive shortcoming of the project to me. Stopping people

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread ael
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:25:24AM +, Devonshire wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote: > > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote: > > The inability to mark an object's location as "authorititive" has always > seemed like a massive shortcoming of the project to me. Stopping people

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread ael
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:08:52PM +1100, Warin wrote: > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote: > > > > I have only just got around to looking in more detail, and discovered > > that it is much worse than I had realised: vandalism. > > > > I have taken waypoints on nearly all of the individual stones,

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread ael
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:53:07AM +, John Aldridge wrote: > On 17-Mar-20 02:08, Warin wrote: > > A single GPS trace is fine if that is all there is, better to average many > > GPS traces, in some locations I have 50+. > > Though, AIUI, once you've reached this level of precision, remaining

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread Devonshire
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote: > On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote: >> In cases like this I would use the source tag on the way so that others have >> a very good chance of seeing it and respecting the previous work rather than >> simply changing it to what they think it should be.

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread Warin
On 17/3/20 8:53 pm, John Aldridge wrote: On 17-Mar-20 02:08, Warin wrote: A single GPS trace is fine if that is all there is, better to average many GPS traces, in some locations I have 50+. Though, AIUI, once you've reached this level of precision, remaining errors are likely to be

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Meetings

2020-03-17 Thread Brian Prangle
I think we'll have to cancel our monthly meetings until further notice @Ian I hope your rail trip is not too chaotic Regards Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Ficticious embankments? Vandalism.

2020-03-17 Thread John Aldridge
On 17-Mar-20 02:08, Warin wrote: A single GPS trace is fine if that is all there is, better to average many GPS traces, in some locations I have 50+. Though, AIUI, once you've reached this level of precision, remaining errors are likely to be systematic (e.g. satellites in a particular