Passenger does a lot of good stuff. There down stream customers use
OSM, and credit it [0]. They release more up to date NaPTAN formatted
data that NaPTAN its self [1]. Honestly it's a bit of a shame the OSM
bus stop data is so neglected.
Cj
[0] https://www.islandbuses.info/explore
[1]
Hey,
You'd have to contact them to ask what license those files are
published under, or get explicit permission for it to be used in OSM.
If you do make contact it may be better to ask for permission to use
the store data from whole website which will include phone number,
opening times,
OSM gets a mention:
"As the Department for Transport begins its journey to
review and redesign NaPTAN, we’re open sourcing
our Bus Stop Checker tool to help build back greener."
Hi,
Cheers for clarifying the 'segregated' issue. I hadn't considered the
benefit of having a positive surface tag even where it matches the default,
so I'll start doing that when I map.
Kind regards,
Adam
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 15:20 Martin - CycleStreets, <
list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net>
Mike Baggaley wrote:
There should be no need for a tag to indicate whether a cycleway is
separated from the road, as if the cycleway is part of the road it should
not be tagged as highway=cycleway at all - it should be tagged as
highway=(something else) + cycleway=*. The
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, Adam Snape wrote:
I have utmost respect for cyclestreets but that tagging guidance does
seem garbled at points
Apologies; I think I was very tired when I wrote it. It was mainly intended
as a starting point, to set out the ideal case of having those metadata
tags
Hey all,
I just accidentally found that the Pub next to "curious 20602512" is operated
by a chain with quite a few places. They provide four different POI file
formats with all their locations.
As this data is pretty much openly accessible, I think there'd be no major
issue with asking them
Whilst we are on USRNs (and UPRNs), I have updated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_OpenData to include
them. The whole discussion on how they join up could merit a wiki section
or page of its own...somewhere to collect together all the snippets of
information.just a gentle
Just a thought, is there any value aligning with Wikidata ('heritage
designation') https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1435 or at least
have links?
On 15/07/2020 11:16, Brian Prangle wrote:
I use listed_status =Scheduled Monument
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 10:19 Tony OSM,
I use listed_status =Scheduled Monument
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 10:19 Tony OSM, wrote:
> Whilst mapping some of my local historic places I have found Scheduled
> Monuments. They are described in the Historic England list as Heritage
> Category: Scheduled Monument and has a List Entry Number.
>
>
On 15/07/2020 09:05, Phillip Barnett wrote:
Could you not just ask the local mapper to knock on any doors in the
street and ASK them the name? And then use that local knowledge?
In this case, there are no doors on the street as it's just an access road!
What might work would be to contact a
On 15/07/2020 08:35, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
We wish to refer you to the Adopted Roads map for this information.
This can found via:
http://maps.ealing.gov.uk/Webreports/Highways/Adoptedroads.html You
are free to use this information for your own use, including for
non-commercial research
Not sure if this is of help - in Scotland there is this link
https://www.historicenvironment.scot/advice-and-support/listing-scheduling-and-designations/scheduled-monuments/types-of-scheduled-monument/
which translates to 'Category' (e.g. Roman: camp) in the gis data set.
On 15/07/2020 10:18,
Whilst mapping some of my local historic places I have found Scheduled
Monuments. They are described in the Historic England list as Heritage
Category: Scheduled Monument and has a List Entry Number.
Building are listed as Heritage Category: Listed Building , Grade: (I,
II*, II) and a list
Could you not just ask the local mapper to knock on any doors in the street and
ASK them the name?
And then use that local knowledge?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 15 Jul 2020, at 08:36, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
>
>
>> I've made an FOI request yesterday and am awaiting a reply. What we could
>>
>> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of
>> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because
>> I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show
>> where bicycles and pedestrians have their own designated
> I've made an FOI request yesterday and am awaiting a reply. What we could
> also do is find a local mapper to answer what he knows about the street.
Getting back to something fun, this is what turned up yesterday:
***
Your request:
In the ELTHORNE ward, SOA E01001248, there’s a small
>On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 22:07, ael
> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:00PM >+0100,
>Adam Snape wrote:
>>
>> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of
>> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because
>> I suspect I'm not the
18 matches
Mail list logo
