Re: [Talk-GB] Proposal: Import EV charging point data

2020-08-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
Plausible deniability is not the reason.

Either 
(1) it is clear that we can do that
without copyright and copyright like
issues and then we can freely ignore
whatever data provider likes it or not

(2) it is not ok to do this in OSM

Reason for not creating such notes
automatically is for example fact that
notes are not supposed to be created
automatically - we have different 
tools for that such as JOSM validator,
StreetComplete and Osmose.

Last one is already including some suggestions
like that.

18 Aug 2020, 15:18 by me-osm-talk...@keepawayfromfire.co.uk:

> On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 12:18 +0100, Steven Hirschorn wrote:
>
>> Are we allowed to put the points on a non-OSM map to ask local
>> mappers to survey?
>>
>
> Legally I think it's a bit ambiguous, but current practice is to do
> exactly that. See tools like [1] where most of the data isn't
> compatible with the ODbL but they are overlaid for local mappers to
> survey and add them selves [2]. At a certain point it may be easier to
> "import to notes", but the current way at least has plausible
> deniability if any data provider was upset that there dataset was used
> to inform surveys.
>
>
> Cj
>
> [1] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/
> [2] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/progress/NE/
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread Andrew Black


On 20/08/2020 12:28, Andy Townsend wrote:


Perhaps "opening_hours:covid19=open"?

Even that's a bit tricky - if an establishment is registered with the 
scheme I guess it doesn't guarantee that it is _currently_ open.


This is (IMHO) part of  a bigger problem that opening times are changing 
more quickly than we can map.


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread osm
> Too transient/inaccurate for me, personally. Even my local LA can't 
> publish an accurate list.

Seeing that the list gets changed almost every day leads me to believe they 
have the same problem.

Also 440+ entries are duplicates so no, a correct list right from the start 
seems to be too much to ask ;-)

> Anyway, I'm too busy mapping garden fences in the hope of upsetting 
> sensibilities.

Noble cause, keep going :-D

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread Dave F via Talk-GB
Too transient/inaccurate for me, personally. Even my local LA can't 
publish an accurate list.


Anyway, I'm too busy mapping garden fences in the hope of upsetting 
sensibilities.


DaveF

On 19/08/2020 21:10, Rob Nickerson wrote:

Hi all,

Anyone considered using the Eat out to Help out data that HMRC have 
published to aid with mapping efforts?


https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments

Prior to this, there was a scraper that collated the data:
https://github.com/svenlatham/eatout-scraper

Thank you,
*Rob*

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread Andy Townsend

On 20/08/2020 09:38, Ken Kilfedder wrote:

What data are available in the EOHO set that we don't get from the FHRS?


Perhaps "opening_hours:covid19=open"?

Even that's a bit tricky - if an establishment is registered with the 
scheme I guess it doesn't guarantee that it is _currently_ open.


Best Regards,

Andy




___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread osm
> Not all of these data are top notch.  A couple of examples I've come across - 
> some outlets are listed by their company name, or the company name of the 
> franchisee, not the brand that appears above the door.   For example Costa 
> Coffee outlets appear (at least in some places) as 'Scoffs Essex ltd'.

Yeah, I've (the someone™) fiddled around with the data EOHO has, and the data 
quality is questionable at best.

> What data are available in the EOHO set that we don't get from the FHRS?

This is now a relatively recent list of establishments that are in business. 
So, if the FHRS rating is say, from 2017, the information could be out-of-date 
- but there's no way of knowing without a survey.

Anyway, I was aming for matching the data against fhrs:id because that is the 
only really unique thing that could be associated with EOHO and OSM.

Or am I missing something?

K

> 
> ---
> https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain
> spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk
> 
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, at 10:17 PM, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
> > Hey Rob,
> > 
> > if they made up their mind about the license 
> > (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/3 - 
> > Apache 2.0 is software, not data) the ~100 entries with wrong postcode 
> > data 
> > (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/18) 
> > out of 62k entries would be ok.
> > 
> > But yeah, it would be great to have some very recent establishment data.
> > 
> > Grouping the Postcodes, there are
> >   38,563 unique postcodes (62.1 % of entries)
> >6,326 pcs occur twice  (20.1 %)
> >1,800 pcs occur thrice  (8.7 %)
> >  611 four times(3.9 %)
> >  214 five times(1.7 %)
> > ...
> > checking those data against the FHRS-OpenData would be relatively easy 
> > and very quick to implement and would allow for 96.5% of the entries to 
> > be checked. Once one has the FHRS data finding an appropriate OSM 
> > object becomes easier.
> > 
> > Someone™ would have to do the coding and once licensing and usage are 
> > clear, the data could be used :-)
> > 
> > Kai
> > 
> > On 19.08.2020 22:10, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Anyone considered using the Eat out to Help out data that HMRC have 
> > > published to aid with mapping efforts?
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments
> > > 
> > > Prior to this, there was a scraper that collated the data:
> > > https://github.com/svenlatham/eatout-scraper
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > *Rob*
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Talk-GB mailing list
> > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> > > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

2020-08-20 Thread Ken Kilfedder
Not all of these data are top notch.  A couple of examples I've come across - 
some outlets are listed by their company name, or the company name of the 
franchisee, not the brand that appears above the door.   For example Costa 
Coffee outlets appear (at least in some places) as 'Scoffs Essex ltd'.

Also, it seems that some office buildings appear with no obvious food outlet 
inside.

What data are available in the EOHO set that we don't get from the FHRS?

---
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain
spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, at 10:17 PM, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
> Hey Rob,
> 
> if they made up their mind about the license 
> (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/3 - 
> Apache 2.0 is software, not data) the ~100 entries with wrong postcode 
> data 
> (https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments/issues/18) 
> out of 62k entries would be ok.
> 
> But yeah, it would be great to have some very recent establishment data.
> 
> Grouping the Postcodes, there are
>   38,563 unique postcodes (62.1 % of entries)
>6,326 pcs occur twice  (20.1 %)
>1,800 pcs occur thrice  (8.7 %)
>  611 four times(3.9 %)
>  214 five times(1.7 %)
> ...
> checking those data against the FHRS-OpenData would be relatively easy 
> and very quick to implement and would allow for 96.5% of the entries to 
> be checked. Once one has the FHRS data finding an appropriate OSM 
> object becomes easier.
> 
> Someone™ would have to do the coding and once licensing and usage are 
> clear, the data could be used :-)
> 
> Kai
> 
> On 19.08.2020 22:10, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Anyone considered using the Eat out to Help out data that HMRC have 
> > published to aid with mapping efforts?
> > 
> > https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments
> > 
> > Prior to this, there was a scraper that collated the data:
> > https://github.com/svenlatham/eatout-scraper
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > *Rob*
> > 
> > ___
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> > 
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb