s which solar power doesn't have. Also, in some cases the
land under/around solar farms is used for grazing, or at any rate it's
still mostly grass. I'm not too bothered either way, though.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB m
se.
Cheers,
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_generation_refinement
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
going to email the tagging list about marking leisure=common as
deprecated, seeing as it's not a great tag anyway, and it's been
removed from the map.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
es. In
rural areas, tagging of grassland is a much-debated subject which is
outside the scope of this thread, but I will not judge.
I suspect there are far more leisure=common areas which are not
legally commons than which are, but it definitely looks like a good
cleanup project in general.
Cheer
th clear licensing) at the moment - I'll see if I can get
some of those other datasets in there as well.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 11:22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> To fit StreetComplete it must be
>
> - refining existing objects, not adding new ones
> - be solvable by any normal human by answering a simple question
One option for this is turning generator=solar nodes into areas.
--
Ru
>> Is there any good way to tag the vertical tilt of a panel? I know in
>> many cases we won't be able to measure it well, but I thought I'd ask.
>> For example, there's roof:angle=* for the slope of a roof, which is a
>> mildly related concept.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 11:36, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> BTW...shouldn't the points on the map reduce when I filter?
They should but I'm still working on that feature.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.
um zoom
levels (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/50.4437/-4.8581)
due to lack of landuse mapping.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
patience. The
ideal is that everywhere is covered by a landuse/natural tag. Stuff
like gardens, buildings, etc, are a higher level of detail which live
inside the broad landuse areas.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing lis
with the infrastructure mappers I know
(I suspect it will be).
Russ
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
r than trig points, and so not something you can go and
plonk your GPS receiver on. The file definitely seems to list the
model of receiver at each one.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
143161.7110356.42 y -21739.43 -25963.72
> 4224.29
> height above 142.73 307.00 -164.27 z 4952444.39 4946141.89
> 6302.49
> sea level
>
> distance 11082.66 11085.53
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ed, so presumably the GPS receiver has some of those incorporated.
I think for the highest accuracy it's probably worth taking the
position as WGS84 rather than doing the coordinate system
transformation on-device, but I'm not 100% sure on this.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett
valid
endeavour in my opinion. But, as I mentioned before, that rabbit hole
can go extremely deep and is probably off topic here. I hope I've
given you a flavour of that though!)
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB maili
orrection should at least get you sub-20cm.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
So I guess it would technically be possible to use Code-Point Open to
add at least one address location to OSM for most postcodes. I'm still
uneasy about doing this automatically though.
Cheers,
[1]
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/documents/product-support/user-guide/code-point-open-user-guide.pdf
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 21:37, Alan Mackie wrote:
> On a completely unrelated note. Does any software actually support site
> relations?
openinframap.org does, for power plants (wind farms etc). I suspect it
may be the only one.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett
t near me where roads are well mapped) but this does
>>> demonstrate what is possible. Let us know if you have a good or bad
>>> experience with this.
>>>
>>> Would be great to see this extended to buildings but we may have to wait
>&
common land. However it looks like
town greens and village greens are legally identical under the Commons
Act. Maybe designation=green might be best, although it looks a little
weird.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:designation=common
--
R
either. So it's not clear what these seaward
extensions currently achieve.
I'd love to find the actual legislation which created this...
Russ
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 22:24, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/09/2020 21:23, Russ Garrett wrote:
> > I've foolishly now decided to try to
on it, though.
Cheers,
Russ
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 18:48, Russ Garrett wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure Flat Holm is part of Cardiff - Steep Holm is in
> England but it also isn't in Bristol as far as I know. There's
> definitely something weird going on with the boundaries there but it
>
_
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
k-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
mminently). It'll likely be a separate task from the module-counting
one. Location is also another task which I could potentially add.
Russ
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
have agreed on, I'll
batch insert the data into OSM using a new account - I will update
this list once that is happening.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 15:41, Russ Garrett wrote:
> Once we have panel counts that multiple people have agreed on, I'll
> batch insert the data into OSM using a new account - I will update
> this list once that is happening.
We now have around 1500 nodes with agreed module counts. I'v
nt re adding them.
All the info you need is (hopefully) here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_the_United_Kingdom/Rooftop_Solar_PV
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetm
ata, especially in
more rural & hilly areas.
In my experience, once you start trying to go below 5m accuracy you
swiftly learn not to trust anyone.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
has done.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ere:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_information_for_UK_mappers
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
os.openstreetmap.org/
and presumably it will percolate down into editors in due course.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
https://osm.mathmos.net/
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https:
lier message I will not make any
> changes to Rockall until we have had the discussion.
>
> Colin
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
s/develop/develop/Ranking
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
London, and I'm pretty sure that there are areas of
London where the area names have never been adequately mapped (which
is why I started this thread). So I'm not sure how best to solve that
conundrum.
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
et" probably shouldn't be present in
London, except in the few legitimately rural areas of outer London. (A
lot of those hamlets are definitely wrong and I plan to go through
them at some point.)
Russ
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB
them.
I've generated a list of all place nodes within Greater London and the
City, by type:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ru/London_Place_Nodes
Cheers,
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
me cases, although the wording is a bit vague and could probably do
with being clarified:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Library_of_Scotland
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 15:49, Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
> Link to this on NLS?
I think it's the "OS 1:1,250/1:2500 1944-1969" layer:
https://maps.nls.uk/os/national-grid/
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing
re the copyright of the scans lies
with other parties, which does not seem to be the case in this
instance) are acceptable for use in OSM.
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> majority actually weren't. But every existing ward boundary is changing in
> any case...)
> ___
> Talk-gb-london mailing list
> Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstre
Talk-gb-london mailing list
> > Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
>
>
> ___
> Talk-gb-london mailing list
> Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
--
Russ Garrett
r...@garrett.co.uk
___
Talk-gb-london mailing list
Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
45 matches
Mail list logo
