Hi all,
An enthusiastic new contributor in the Lakes area has admitted using OS
data in one of their changesets — afaik copying from OS walking maps
is not allowed, and I don’t think any of the OS OpenData data sets
include PRoW designations (I’m happy to be corrected on this).
What’s the right
On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For
> example,
> is this:
>
> https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542
>
> a) a fence,
>
> b) a hedge,
>
> c) a very narrow wood,
>
> d) all three at the same time?
>
> Is the area
On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 08:01 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> A couple of updates to my tools that you might be interested in:
>
> First there's a new set of objects in my "Ghosts" tool at
> https://osm.mathmos.net/ghosts/. There are 162 still-mapped "Co-Op
> Pharmacy" branches, which
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 12:52 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 04/05/18 12:28, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> > Or do people think we should use amenity=post_office for them with
> > some other tagging used to differentiate things? If we did want to
> > use
> > other tagging to differentiate,
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 13:29 +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> Some of you may have already seen that a few weeks ago I eventually
> got a positive response from Post Office Ltd. (POL) to a request I
> made for a re-usable list of their branches, and permission to use it
> to help
Hi all,
Who’s maintaining the NaPTAN merge tool? It seems to be broken — every
request to the node layer gives a HTTP error 403.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN
_and_OSM_data#Tools
http://b3e.net/novam/
Thanks,
Philip
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 12:55 +0300, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might remember a few months ago I discussed here importing of
> Shell fuel stations. The data provider is Navads, which has a
> contract with Shell for putting their stations on the map. They asked
> me to proceed with the import
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 14:06 +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> On 29/09/17 13:56, Bob Hawkins wrote:
>
> > In the absence of the image, the two signs read as follows: 1. In
> > white
> > on blue: Oxfordshire County Council/No vehicles beyond this point
> > except
> > for access.
>
>
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 13:16 +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 11:28 +0100, James Harrison wrote:
> >
> > As an aside to this conversation, where are photos most useful for
> > OSM
> > contributions? Just built-up areas or road junctions etc? If we
> > were
> > designing a
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 18:37 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> PS: To contrast with the good news here, East Riding of Yorkshire is
> being decidedly unhelpful at
> https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/public_rights_of_way_gis_data_
> 2
> , although they'll need to drag their feet for
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 17:11 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> On 23 August 2017 at 15:25, Philip Withnall <phi...@tecnocode.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 11:30 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
> > wrote:
> > > Some of you have have alr
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 11:30 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> Some of you have have already come across my Public Rights of Way
> comparison tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/ which
> aims to help mappers trying to complete the mapping of Rights of Way
> in their area.
12 matches
Mail list logo
