Re: [Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Cj Malone]

Passenger does a lot of good stuff. There down stream customers use
OSM, and credit it [0]. They release more up to date NaPTAN formatted
data that NaPTAN its self [1]. Honestly it's a bit of a shame the OSM
bus stop data is so neglected.


Cj

[0] https://www.islandbuses.info/explore
[1] https://www.islandbuses.info/open-data



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Andy Mabbett]

OSM gets a mention:

   "As the Department for Transport begins its journey to
review and redesign NaPTAN, we’re open sourcing
our Bus Stop Checker tool to help build back greener."

   
https://www.discoverpassenger.com/2020/07/13/passengers-bus-stop-checker-data-quality-tools-now-open-source/

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Jez Nicholson]

I just updated the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Copyright_Infringement
 section.

Your input (on the wiki) to assist new and existing UK mappers would be
greatly appreciated.

It does seem heavily Ordnance Survey dominated. I'm sure that other data
sources have been ratified as usable.

Regards,
 Jez
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Rob Nickerson]

Hi all,

The following from Dorothea at OSMF. We'll see what scope there is for OSM
UK to answer (likely just re-iterating our aims and membership size). I
encourage individuals to respond too.

Best wishes
Rob

Hello,

The following survey on global and local communities in OpenStreetMap
was developed by board members. The survey is not quantitative and its
aim is to stimulate  discussions in local communities and at the Local
Chapters Congress at SotM.
https://osmf.limequery.org/428835

~ The survey will run for two weeks.
~ Only one question is mandatory: "How can we share your answers?".

There is more information on the scope of the survey and approach on the
opening page.

warm greetings,

Dorothea
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Jez Nicholson]

I see that Geospatial Commission's innovation project winners have been
announced
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/funding-awarded-to-innovative-data-projects
(scroll
to the bottom for the list)

OSMUK were assisting one of the bidding consortiums, but they unfortunately
didn't get through.

I can see Cyclestreets on there as well as Beeline.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Gregory]

Could I float the idea of individuals & corporates being distinguished more
in name. Members (individuals) & corporate supporters/partners.

>From Newcastle,
Gregory.
On Mar 6, 2016 7:00 PM, "Brian Prangle"  wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> I'll be scheduling a concall shortly where we can progress the Articles of
> Association and also hopefully finalise the objectives and name of the
> chapter.
>
> Membership options: the following is offered as a summary of what we might
> do:
>
> 1.Standard membership £5 per year
> Pros: affordable and inclusive
> Cons: doesn't give us a lot of revenue to do things
> 2.Discounts for multiple years purchase e.g. £40 for 12 years
> Pros: front loads income
> Cons: Accounting years complications
> 3. Life Membership  £100
> Pros and cons as for 2 above
> 4. Corporate membership
> SMEs with turnover <£1m, charities and public organisations £25
> Businesses with turnover > £1m  £250
> Pros: gives us revenue and a network of contacts.
> Cons: None I can think of except the amounts might be wrong; and there is
> some opinion we should wait before we invite corporate membership
>
> The controversial question is whether corporate members get a vote - still
> to be decided
>
> Regards
>
> Brian
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Brian Prangle]

Hi everyone

I'll be scheduling a concall shortly where we can progress the Articles of
Association and also hopefully finalise the objectives and name of the
chapter.

Membership options: the following is offered as a summary of what we might
do:

1.Standard membership £5 per year
Pros: affordable and inclusive
Cons: doesn't give us a lot of revenue to do things
2.Discounts for multiple years purchase e.g. £40 for 12 years
Pros: front loads income
Cons: Accounting years complications
3. Life Membership  £100
Pros and cons as for 2 above
4. Corporate membership
SMEs with turnover <£1m, charities and public organisations £25
Businesses with turnover > £1m  £250
Pros: gives us revenue and a network of contacts.
Cons: None I can think of except the amounts might be wrong; and there is
some opinion we should wait before we invite corporate membership

The controversial question is whether corporate members get a vote - still
to be decided

Regards

Brian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Manfred A. Reiter]

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 268, is now available online in
English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu Enjoy! weeklyOSM is brought to
you by ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM

-- 
## Manfred Reiter - -
## www.weeklyOSM.eu
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Lee Galea]

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] (no subject)

[Lee Galea]

Done
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb