Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-21 Thread Dave F
Hi This situation occurs nationally; it's just been highlighted around Nottingham. I created an admin 10 relation for the city of Bath, but had it pointed to me that it didn't have a direct council & so the boundary was changed to 'place' http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5342409 I can p

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-21 Thread ajt1...@gmail.com
On 20/08/2016 13:33, Colin Smale wrote: In the East Midlands Alex Kemp has been adding relations for these unparished areas, only distinguishable from Civil Parish relations by means of the value of the "designation" tag. This is contrary to our normal practice and feels counter-intuitive - w

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Colin Smale wrote: > I was hoping that we could find some middle ground by allowing > the relations to persist but outside the admin boundary regime Yes, I would agree with this. If there's no administration then they're not admin boundaries. > If I'm honest I am beginning to doubt whether the e

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread Colin Smale
from the admin and political > boundaries. > > Ed > > FROM: Colin Smale [mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl] > SENT: 20 August 2016 13:34 > TO: Talk-GB > SUBJECT: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle? > > Hi everyone, > > There have b

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread David Woolley
On 20/08/16 13:33, Colin Smale wrote: So, ahow *should* they be tagged? What should be done with these unparished areas? Should the existing relations be reverted? Retagged to something else? Should we document this and encourage other admin boundary maintainers like me to replicate the pattern

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread Brian Prangle
My vote goes to not mapping them. They don't exist as entities intrinsically, only as a negative relation of an existing entity On 20 Aug 2016 1:35 p.m., "Colin Smale" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > There have been some discussions in the past couple of weeks about > unparished areas, i.e. areas in E

Re: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread Ed Loach
suspect people might add 10 so they can extract the full set by admin_level) to keep it separate from the admin and political boundaries. Ed From: Colin Smale [mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl] Sent: 20 August 2016 13:34 To: Talk-GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas

[Talk-GB] Admin boundaries for unparished areas - how to handle?

2016-08-20 Thread Colin Smale
Hi everyone, There have been some discussions in the past couple of weeks about unparished areas, i.e. areas in England which are not part of any Civil Parish. Civil Parishes are given an administrative boundary relation with admin_level=10 to represent their entity as an administrative area. But