Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

Sorry if I did not make myself clear enough.  (Every day is a new learning opportunity!) At least it's good to know that I have not broken the system :-) Regards,Peter On Monday, 27 April 2020, 11:24:14 BST, Andy Townsend wrote: On 27/04/2020 11:16, Peter Neale wrote: It see

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 11:16, Peter Neale wrote: It seems that we have had 2 of us attempting the same change at the same time. Generally speaking, IRC's better for this sort of request as everyone sees what's happening in real time I hope that the database change  control can cope with this. It

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

.   From: Peter Neale via Talk-GB Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 10:43 AM To: Talk-GB ; Jez Nicholson Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?   I think that I understand the issue.  A solution may be to delete individual points until the whole way is small enough to be shown

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

A big thank you form me to everyone who sorted this out :) On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 AM Andy Townsend wrote: > On 27/04/2020 11:09, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: > > I THINK I have done it. > > It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was > able to cut the offend

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

It seems that we have had 2 of us attempting the same change at the same time.  I hope that the database change  control can cope with this. I did try to avoid such a clash by responding here before starting work. Regards,Peter On Monday, 27 April 2020, 11:12:59 BST, Andy Townsend wro

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 11:09, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: I THINK I have done it. It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was able to cut the offending line and delete a section at a time (which fitted on the screen). That definitely sounds like "the hard way" :) It

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

On 27/04/2020 10:56, Jez Nicholson wrote: Note that the vast majority of the points in the Way were pre-existing. Any fix should leave them in place. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:54 AM nathan case > wrote: I’m fairly sure Potlach (assuming you want to tackle t

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

I THINK I have done it.   It took a bit of fiddling to separate some shared points, but then I was able to cut the offending line and delete a section at a time (which fitted on the screen). I hope that I have not disturbed anything else in the process.   Regards,Peter Peter Neale t: 01908 3096

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

one go – rather than deleting > point by point. > > > > Cheers. > > > > *From:* Peter Neale via Talk-GB > *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2020 10:43 AM > *To:* Talk-GB ; Jez Nicholson < > jez.nichol...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this chan

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

] Can anyone reverse this changeset please? I think that I understand the issue. A solution may be to delete individual points until the whole way is small enough to be shown on a screen at editable zoom. I am happy to spend a while trying this, but it is probably best if only one of us is

Re: [Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

I think that I understand the issue.  A solution may be to delete individual points until the whole way is small enough to be shown on a screen at editable zoom.   I am happy to spend a while trying this, but it is probably best if only one of us is stirring the pot at once. Regards,Peter

[Talk-GB] Can anyone reverse this changeset please?

A new user has created a new way in Brighton to indicate the Hollingbury residential error https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785162533 They freely admit their error but are unable to remove it, as am I. Would anyone be able to assist please? I only have anecdotal evidence (like this one) but it se