As long as all sections have junction=roundabout it will work fine, if
those creating routers are worth their salt. OSM is geospatially aware.
Any router should be know it's in the UK & drive on the left & go
clockwise around a roundabout.
DaveF
On 06/11/2019 07:40, Edward Bainton wrote:
On 06/11/2019 00:53, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
This one looks like a right mess given the loop with the bus stop is one
way.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=19/52.58839/-0.21216
It's also the wrong relation type. route_masters should have route
relations as their
Thanks both
@Andy - you're right it certainly doesn't!
As the hospital access road (running ENE-WSW) is merely wide with islands
rather than formally a dual carriageway, should it be shown as two ways
like that?
@Dave F When you say roundabouts need
splitting, will they still get interpreted
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=2580522=true&_noCache=on
Click on 'Analysis on map'
All bits with a marker need looking at, plus roundabouts require
splitting as the bus doesn't go all the way around.
This one looks like a right mess given the loop with the bus stop is
On 05/11/2019 22:51, Edward Bainton wrote:
What do I do about a fixme on a relation?
A bus route near me says fixme=check relation plus members - appears
broken
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=14/52.5823/-0.2418=N
Presumably 'broken' means the route has gaps in it?
On a
What do I do about a fixme on a relation?
A bus route near me says fixme=check relation plus members - appears broken
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=14/52.5823/-0.2418=N
Presumably 'broken' means the route has gaps in it?
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 21:18, Rob Nickerson
wrote:
On 22/10/2019 10:38, and...@black1.org.uk wrote:
On 2019-10-21 11:26, Andy Townsend wrote:
I don't have data for the whole UK, but do have numbers for "OSM
notes" and "fixme tags" for a couple of areas going back at least a
couple of years. If people are interested I could pull the numbers
So far I have looked at two regions in the UK for fixmes: Warwickshire and
the North West.
In Warwickshire it can be difficult to resolve the fixmes as most (but not
all) require a lot of work. I found a completely different story in the
North West. I found a good number of fixmes there which had
On 2019-10-21 11:26, Andy Townsend wrote:
I don't have data for the whole UK, but do have numbers for "OSM
notes" and "fixme tags" for a couple of areas going back at least a
couple of years. If people are interested I could pull the numbers
together.
I'd be interested in seeing these
On 21/10/2019 10:53, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
21 Oct 2019, 11:46 by bpran...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone
So far according tothe taginfo script we've managed to ADD 415
fixmes and remove 84 FIXMEs. I don't have data yet on OSM Notes.
Don't know what's going on here with the
21 Oct 2019, 11:46 by bpran...@gmail.com:
> Hi everyone
>
> So far according tothe taginfo script we've managed to ADD 415 fixmes and
> remove 84 FIXMEs. I don't have data yet on OSM Notes. Don't know what's going
> on here with the increase when the aim of the project is to reduce the
>
Hi everyone
So far according tothe taginfo script we've managed to ADD 415 fixmes and
remove 84 FIXMEs. I don't have data yet on OSM Notes. Don't know what's
going on here with the increase when the aim of the project is to reduce
the numbers by fixing the issues indicated nad thereby improve
12 matches
Mail list logo
