Kevin Peat wrote:
Making this sort of distinction (what can have a postcode) is incredibly
>difficult - for instance NCP carparks do have a postcode.
>
Shame about that, but if someone does a full postcode search and there
are OSM objects tagged with that exact postcode then wouldn't it be
bette
lk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] FW: Office of National Statistics data
On another track it would be good if ITOworld could add to their buildings
section a postcode map showing red = no postcode, yellow=first section only
e.g B27, and green= complete postcode e.g B27 7XP. This would help in
identifying
On 31 October 2012 18:14, Brian Quinion
wrote:
>
> Making this sort of distinction (what can have a postcode) is incredibly
> difficult - for instance NCP carparks do have a postcode.
>
Shame about that, but if someone does a full postcode search and there
are OSM objects tagged with that exact p
On another track it would be good if ITOworld could add to their buildings
section a postcode map showing red = no postcode, yellow=first section only
e.g B27, and green= complete postcode e.g B27 7XP. This would help in
identifying where to add postcodes
Regards
Brian
On 31 October 2012 18:55,
On 31/10/12 18:37, Richard Bullock wrote:
On 31/10/12 13:58, Kev js1982 wrote:
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open
did? If so that is one way it's better than code point open
I have just finished processing the BT codes, so Northern Irish post
codes are now
On 31/10/12 13:58, Kev js1982 wrote:
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open
did? If so that is one way it's better than code point open
I have just finished processing the BT codes, so Northern Irish post
codes are now available too. I haven't been able to cros
On Oct 31, 2012 6:14 PM, "Brian Quinion"
wrote:
>
> On 31 October 2012 16:59, Kevin Peat wrote:
>>
>> On 31 October 2012 14:50, Tom Chance wrote:
>> > I think this is quite a confusing approach. Post code searches often
end up
>> > returning the wrong street that is also near the centroid, house
On 31 October 2012 16:59, Kevin Peat wrote:
> On 31 October 2012 14:50, Tom Chance wrote:
> > I think this is quite a confusing approach. Post code searches often end
> up
> > returning the wrong street that is also near the centroid, houses that
> don't
> > belong to that post code that happen
On 31 October 2012 14:50, Tom Chance wrote:
> I think this is quite a confusing approach. Post code searches often end up
> returning the wrong street that is also near the centroid, houses that don't
> belong to that post code that happen to be nearby, and also weird objects
> like trees and car
On 31/10/12 13:58, Kev js1982 wrote:
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open
did? If so that is one way it's better than code point open
I have just finished processing the BT codes, so Northern Irish post
codes are now available too. I haven't been able to cr
On 31 October 2012 13:04, Brian Quinion
wrote:
> It does a search using the royal mail postcode but then returns only data
> found in OSM.
>
Ahh, thanks.
I think this is quite a confusing approach. Post code searches often end up
returning the wrong street that is also near the centroid, houses
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open did?
If so that is one way it's better than code point open
On Oct 31, 2012 11:45 AM, "Tom Hughes" wrote:
> On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
>
> Can we get this data into Nominatim?
>>
>
> Why? What would it give us over
On 31 October 2012 12:25, SomeoneElse wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 31/10/12 11:58, Steve Doerr wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>>
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wr
Tom Hughes wrote:
Is that different to what's used on www.openstreetmap.org for the Search
box? That's where I want to see accurate postcode searching.
The search box on www.osm.org uses nominatim.osm.org which as far as I know is
running Nominatim 2 and includes Codepoint Open as a data sourc
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:58, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePo
On 31/10/12 11:58, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Is
On 31/10/2012 11:54, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Is that in there?
I believe it is in No
On 31/10/12 11:51, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Is that in there?
I believe it is in Nominatim 2 yes.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...
On 31/10/2012 11:44, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Is that in there?
--
Steve
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
On 31/10/12 11:39, Steve Doerr wrote:
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Why? What would it give us over the CodePoint Open data?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://li
Can we get this data into Nominatim?
Steve
On 31/10/2012 11:07, Andy Robinson wrote:
We are back on for postcode interpretation and addition to buildings again.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 30 October 2012 19:25
To: Talk GB
Subjec
We are back on for postcode interpretation and addition to buildings again.
Cheers
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
> Sent: 30 October 2012 19:25
> To: Talk GB
> Subject: [Talk-GB] Office of National Statistics data
>
> The UK Office for National S
22 matches
Mail list logo
